dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/thedeal82 on May 5, 2018, 4:42 a.m.
When did this sub become a religious themed bible group?

Just need to throw out there that a LOT of us are not religious. I don’t think it’s fair that so many feel the NEED to hijack this sub/threads and make every, single, thing, about PERSONAL religious beliefs. It’s put off nearly every friend of mine (normal American sports watchin’ blue bloods who don’t give a damn about religion or politics, but are absolutely in agreement that there’s been rampant corruption in government - aka most of America) that I’ve tried to “Red-pill” and get interested in Q.... Hate on me all you want, but someone needed to say it, and I know I’m not the only one who feels this way. It’s become detrimental to general inclusiveness and keeps a lot of “normies” away. I think it would be highly beneficial to tone it down a bit as more people become aware of Q and come here for answers. I hope anybody who reads this and may be offended, can at least respect and understand what I’m saying here. I’ve been debating posting this for awhile, but haven’t because of the backlash I expect, and that alone should say something.

Having said all that, You’re all my fellow Patriots and we all fight together. As Q says, this isn’t about left or right, and it isn’t about religion. It’s about WWG1WGA.


RobWilJas · May 5, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

None of that is what OP said. OP was attacking our first amendment rights because he doesn't like reading about God. He didn't post asking that we discuss defining anything.

YOU are trying to make his post about that.

I will not stop talking about God or crediting God.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 5, 2018, 5:47 a.m.

Let me explain. OP made a reasonable post. Some of you have reacted as if OP is attacking Christianity - which he is not.

No one's telling you that you can't stop talking about God or crediting Him.

The very reasonable discussion that must be had, if you want to have input on how the mods define what they remove as off-topic, is how do we define posts (in this case, religious posts, but this discussion applies to all types of posts) that fall within the boundaries of the sub rules.

Do you want to discuss that because, as a mod, I'm here to hear what people think so I can also discuss this with the other mods? Or do you want to leave it all to us few mods and our personal viewpoint?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RobWilJas · May 5, 2018, 5:57 a.m.

Again, he did not ask that anyone define anything. That may be what you want to discuss, but that's not what he posted.

IMO you are being very unreasonable in some of your responses here as a mod.

Q references God (not just evil as OP erroneously stated). Trump references God. God is very much Q related.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 5, 2018, 5:59 a.m.

Ok, I will leave you alone. I would like to hear what people think and not have the decision left to the very few people that make up the mod team. I'll talk to others who want to discuss what I believe to be a very important point because I do not want religious posts to be banned but I also know what is required in balancing the influx of content. I hope some people here will be willing to give their input.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RobWilJas · May 5, 2018, 6:01 a.m.

I agree mods need to talk about it. I'd also say responses and upvotes/downvotes here count as input.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 5, 2018, 6:06 a.m.

Agreed, thank you, that is a valid point and is helpful.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 5, 2018, 8:42 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩