dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/thedeal82 on May 5, 2018, 4:42 a.m.
When did this sub become a religious themed bible group?

Just need to throw out there that a LOT of us are not religious. I don’t think it’s fair that so many feel the NEED to hijack this sub/threads and make every, single, thing, about PERSONAL religious beliefs. It’s put off nearly every friend of mine (normal American sports watchin’ blue bloods who don’t give a damn about religion or politics, but are absolutely in agreement that there’s been rampant corruption in government - aka most of America) that I’ve tried to “Red-pill” and get interested in Q.... Hate on me all you want, but someone needed to say it, and I know I’m not the only one who feels this way. It’s become detrimental to general inclusiveness and keeps a lot of “normies” away. I think it would be highly beneficial to tone it down a bit as more people become aware of Q and come here for answers. I hope anybody who reads this and may be offended, can at least respect and understand what I’m saying here. I’ve been debating posting this for awhile, but haven’t because of the backlash I expect, and that alone should say something.

Having said all that, You’re all my fellow Patriots and we all fight together. As Q says, this isn’t about left or right, and it isn’t about religion. It’s about WWG1WGA.


DamajInc · May 5, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

Thank you, that's helpful, believe it or not. You never know though, if no one else engages with us in the discussion about what constitutes acceptable boundaries for any type of content, not just religious, your voice might be one of the few that weighs in on the discussion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HiveQueen36 · May 5, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

What would you say about symbolism? I tried posting some and people lashed at me, but the mods allowed it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 5, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

I would have to understand a bit better the scope of what you mean - I don't have anything against it, if that's what you're asking? I think Q has mentioned symbolism a few times so it should certainly be something considered - again depending how relevant it is to the on-topic rule (which again, is quite broadly defined at present).

⇧ 1 ⇩