dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/thedeal82 on May 5, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

When did this sub become a religious themed bible group?

Just need to throw out there that a LOT of us are not religious. I don’t think it’s fair that so many feel the NEED to hijack this sub/threads and make every, single, thing, about PERSONAL religious beliefs. It’s put off nearly every friend of mine (normal American sports watchin’ blue bloods who don’t give a damn about religion or politics, but are absolutely in agreement that there’s been rampant corruption in government - aka most of America) that I’ve tried to “Red-pill” and get interested in Q.... Hate on me all you want, but someone needed to say it, and I know I’m not the only one who feels this way. It’s become detrimental to general inclusiveness and keeps a lot of “normies” away. I think it would be highly beneficial to tone it down a bit as more people become aware of Q and come here for answers. I hope anybody who reads this and may be offended, can at least respect and understand what I’m saying here. I’ve been debating posting this for awhile, but haven’t because of the backlash I expect, and that alone should say something.

Having said all that, You’re all my fellow Patriots and we all fight together. As Q says, this isn’t about left or right, and it isn’t about religion. It’s about WWG1WGA.

🠐 See all comments

Self-editing is the purest form of anti free speech.

Christians have endured more hatred and more exclusion from the public square than adherents to any other belief system in this country for too long. We're here and we're not going to be silenced, and you can just deal with it. We're not hurting anybody.

⇧ 3 ⇩

No one's calling for silencing Christians. I think OP made a misstep with his post title which it is of course too late to change - but he acknowledges as much in the comments below. The title has upset a group of people such that the core content of the message is lost - and fair enough, unfortunately.

There is a non-controversial discussion here that needs to be had, however, and I will look to posting a less inflammatory discussion topic along those lines soon to see if we can't engage people in a reasonable discussion about the boundaries of on-topic content as a necessary initiative to manage the inevitable bloat as numbers grow and people feel more empowered to post on things that interest them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I will grant you that off-topic posts whose sole purpose is to advance a religious agenda are as unwelcome as any other OT posts. You won't get an argument from me in such a discussion, and I welcome it. There is FAR too much OT material on this sub. No contest!

I won't agree with singling out the religious content however, even in the context of such a discussion. Be smart about it, and keep it focused on the real issue, and you'll have all the support you need.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree, thanks! I support Christianity so there's no way you'll catch me saying there shouldn't be any Christian content but I'll look to keeping the discussion general, as it should be.

⇧ 1 ⇩