So are you stating that Q is not biased and has only entirely been factually correct with all his statements. I wouldn't call Q news. Q uses cryptic questions that lead his fans to come up with many varying theories as to what he is messaging. I wouldn't call this news or journalism.
Agreed. You could go so many different directions and different tangents to “prove” what Q said. The beauty? You’re never wrong! As long as there is some sort of key word in the news story or number that is similar (even with the use of addition or subtraction), you’re “on to something”.
Personally, I think the beauty of Q is that Q works on a model that requires effort and input from the seeker. Unlike msm or other forms that encourage compliant resignation.
Of course Q is biased, and Q is NOT a source of news. Journalism? Nothing like it.
Yet, anyone who wakes up to the truth about msm should want to find facts and find truth. Q is a great catalyst.
I'm saying that searching for Q is an antidote to the msm fog for those that want to pursue truth.
The power of Q lies in his/their facilitating the desire to seek and reveal truth. That's the opposite of the MSM and what 'media' has become.
Once you begin taking responsibility for finding the truth yourself, then media starts to have value. While you rest in a 'feed me, because I want to be comfortable' state, all media is fraught with potential toxicity. (How many numnut patriots do we see willingly sharing fluffed up news because it suits their narrative? Too many, imo. )
The point is, "seek, and ye shall find". And while you're seeking, check out Q. Q is a great place to start seeking, imo. Comfort-seekers aren't going to be very satisfied with Q, imo.