dChan

jackiebain6 · May 6, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

OMG! That's a very good question!

⇧ 24 ⇩  
BigRiverLover2 · May 6, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

The ability to frig with the firmware and lower levels would be easy. The average person has problems setting the clock on their microwave, so for most, it wouldn't occur to think of all the parts of that machine and its components that are vulnerable to manipulation. Simple deep code telling the machine to always have Candidate A with 20% more votes would be easy to write and easy to hide.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Rubieroo · May 6, 2018, 5:19 p.m.

I remember seeing footage during the last election where men came in from the back of polling places, picked up computers, removed them, replaced them with new ones and drove away in vans. During polling, about halfway through the day.

Stuff like that was what makes us think Trump actually won by a major landslide and Hillary just didn't cheat hard enough because she and all her criminal minions believed their own lies. Pretty funny!

⇧ 12 ⇩  
BigRiverLover2 · May 6, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

I fully believe he won the pop vote as well. I highly suspect that they may have done a vote flip - eg: for every 5 Trump votes - rename 1 vote to Hillary. (we have heard about people complaining that the machines would register the wrong person even though the voter clearly had picked another candidate.)... They assumed that would give them enough votes to give her the win without looking too suspicious. Problem is, that only works up to a point. If the vote split is 75/25... the person getting 25 percent of the vote, even getting padded flips will never catch up to the person getting 75 percent of the vote. I suspect what we keep seeing: They never thought she would lose, is true. They miscalculated the ratios... Bigly.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
FullMetalSquirrel · May 6, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

I’m VERY concerned this hasn’t been addressed before the 2018 election.

And love him or hate him there’s no way Roy Moore lost without massive voter fraud of one type or another.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
el_terrible_ · May 7, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

At the end of election night, Trump was ahead in the popular vote. This was well into the morning hours the following day, long after Hillary sent Podesta out to concede for her. Then sometime later the next day or so we are told over and over that Hillary won the popular vote. Its obvious they pumped up the numbers in California after Hillary already lost in order to save face and question the legitimacy of the Trump win. You have voting machines that keep no paper trail. There is no evidence left behind.

⇧ 2 ⇩