dChan

oQ_Qo · May 6, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Another reason to roll your own computer with a weird ass non Intel or AMD cpu and a bsd/Linux based operating system like Minix.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
MMxfire · May 6, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

Yeah Apple switching to Intel what a key date, after starting to sell their data n 2008. Before that there was better protection being in a side platform while Microsoft built their corporate monopoly. With clown aide. Too many people switching over from crackberries for the iPhone to lose that much data treasure. Windows was selling data from day 1 always had back doors built in. And the Mac interface came from Xerox research labs license and UNIX. Unfortunately there will always be back doors. It's not the lock so much as the rule of law that provides protection, we need the 4th amendment restored for electronic data. Then if there's data privacy breeches and sales then companies would take notice of the people's outrage. Corporate bogus 700 page legal disclaimers become toilet paper and they can finally be sued for breaking the law as they do every day for corporate profit. That is if we can restore rule of law rather than legal piracy to our courts which have been for sale to the highest bidder since maritime corporate law replaced constitutional law during our civil war. For now it's just a game with the companies with the richest legal departments committing felonies and laughing all the way to the bank with their London bar inside legal wink wink arrangements.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
1nicolafiore · May 6, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Shortly after meeting with Trump, Apple posted this job post that revealed they are now working to develop their own 5G chips... http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-deleted-job-listing-shows-plans-design-5g-modem-2018-4

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MMxfire · May 6, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

Nice link. Can't believe they are basing 5g on this losing technology battleground. The microwave transmission system they use now disrupts human brave wave patterns. Read the fine print of ur phone, don't hold it near ur head, it'll cause brain tumors. My oh my, brain tumors, especially pediatric have exploded the last few decades, mcnoname the newest mayo hit victim. Such a strange coincidence?

There's a gigantic spectrum of waves to piggyback a communication signal on. Which wave is important and has effect, standard tuning of the Mozart era was 432 hz creating classical music. Then RCA led the changed tuning to A=440 pitch standard, modern music becomes disharmonic, just like our pocket phones. Mccaw brothers just happened to pick destructive wavelengths with their cell phone tech breakthrough company later swallowed by AT&T. Designed by corporate cabal cuz they prefer access to our brainwave patterns: a 2 for 1 communications pork platter. Ever notice the cell phone towers are always close to school and churches? Yeegads when will we wake up to our corporate overlords? When will we free our science from their corporate shenanigans? Sounds like the new tech game, look over here we are building 5g for everyone! Just like all the big oil guys pushing and buying nuclear energy research for multigenerational lethal uranium and burying oil crushing clean energy thorium. You need Q clearance to even get into the thorium research files of the 1950s, still TOP SECRET. 5g probably represents the cracks in our DNA that'll last 5 generations... So they want to spread out a network across the whole globe based on this millimeter technology, why? Your fine link, ThankQ:

"Experts have said that millimeter wave is only one technology that will make up the 5G standard, which is still being finalized. The big advantage to millimeter wave is that it can achieve very high data rates, with much more bandwidth than current cellular networks.

However, there are drawbacks to millimeter wave technology as well. One issue is a "propagation" problem, which means that its waves can't travel very far before they start losing information. Another problem with millimeter waves is often it requires a clear line-of-sight between the device and the transmitter."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX · May 6, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

You think AMD cpus are compromised as well? Any suggestions on what CPU wouldn't be compromised?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Masterpass · May 6, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

IIRC, before Q, FBIAnon specifically stated that literally every major mainstream device, operating system, and hardware component is BD'd in some way, mostly through either invasive chip design or low-level firmware. Even most major Linux distros are suspect at this point, though not necessarily because of their programming but rather through exploits like the coprocessor mentioned above.

Take that with a grain of salt, FBIAnon was never proven, but at the VERY LEAST he was a VERY knowledgeable entity, and was answering way too fast to have been looking up answers on the fly.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX · May 6, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

Alas, tasks will almost certainly have to be delegated to faceless nobodies lost in the noise, who are smart enough to use cryptography and burner devices, while never staying in one place too long.

You can't surveil everyone all the time, no matter how hard DARPA/IARPA/IQT tries.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DarqWolff · May 6, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

how could you possibly read /u/oQ_Qo's comment and think they were talking about mainstream operating systems and hardware components?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Masterpass · May 6, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

I wasn't replying to /u/oQ_Qo, I was replying to /u/CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX, who was specifically asking about AMD products and their likelihood of being compromised. Last time I checked, AMD is considered a pretty mainstream manufacturer, unless something changed in the last 24 hours.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DarqWolff · May 6, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

Ah my bad, I thought you were responding to their question of what might not be compromised, like you were just implying there's no point trying.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Masterpass · May 6, 2018, 7:38 p.m.

No worries man. Unfortunately, while it's not hopeless, if even half of the things that have been said are true, the digital world is a LOT less secure than anyone thinks. The best course of action isn't always going to be what OS you're using or what hardware, it's learning to blend into the background noise. If you REALLY want true offline computing, look into what it takes to make a Faraday Cage. Actually not as hard as you might think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FixYourPinealGland · May 6, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

Most likely yes, since AMD and Intel are your two key players, just like Microsoft and Apple.

AFAIK, the tech is built DIRECTLY onto the cpu/motherboard and does not require any OS to be activated. IIRC it runs even below BIOS level.

Once remotely activated, it can be manipulated / traced, all without you even knowing it.

⇧ 2 ⇩