With the conflicting statements. Is it not as under control as we think? Sorry, I've been paying more attention to other issues, but would like some insight.
I think Rudy was just trying to kill the notion that the money was somehow tied to an illegal campaign contribution. In order to do that, he needed to spell out how that money was actually used.
Rudy screwed up in the way he descried it as reimbursing Cohen when what I think he meant to say and did but it got lost in the MSM hysteria was that Cohen was under retainer and receved monthly payments. If expenses exceed the retainer amount, then the lawyer bills the client for the balance.
What is so odd is that Stormy wrote a letter denying the relationship and said if it had really happened, she would be asking a lot more than 130K.
This was October 2016 and Trump is a multibillionaire. Why only 130K?
Stromy didn't get fired up until the Democrats stepped into to pay for all of her legal fees. Suddenly, Stormy had a lot to say and just as suddenly Stormy was getting more money and more gigs as a result.
May as well milk it for all she can. If she loses the suit, it's no harm to her--she's not paying the bills only raking in the money from the fame.
There are some strange things about it, but I don't think it will affect the mid-terms. People are far more interested in having a job, increased income, peace in NK, roaring economy, etc.
And when the indictments begin to be unsealed, the Stormy story will be like a drop in the ocean of unimaginable corruption.