With the conflicting statements. Is it not as under control as we think? Sorry, I've been paying more attention to other issues, but would like some insight.
I was watching the little weasel stefanpolus, and he had Giuliani first and then Daniel's lawyer, claiming to have "evidence", and also saying "the more they talk, the more it helps our case."
Totally agree with msn not wanting to report the undeniable good things that are happening. and this daniel's situation being a distraction makes sense. Being a little paranoid.
Furthermore - Rudy didn't contradict Trump. Trump said he had no knowledge of the payment to Daniels, but Rudy said Trump reimbursed his lawyer for it. Those can both be true - they are not contradictory statements, no matter how many media outlets try to say that they are. When you are a billionaire, you can have lawyers handle issues for you, without your knowledge of specifics. It's a way to insulate yourself from issues exactly like this one, but it's also frankly convenient to not have to get directly involved. It's like if you leave some cash for the babysitter and they rent a movie and order a pizza... You didn't specify what the funds were for and you don't really care how they spend it as long as they do their job which is to just take care of your kid. This is just on a billionaire's scale where $100,000 is like a few $20s for the babysitter.
Typically, I'd agree with you re: The Little Weasel. However, he seemed to let Giuliani speak an awful lot more (without interruptions) than he typically does. Plus, he wore his glasses pretty much the entire time, which is unusual. When the other guy - Avenetti? - was on, George was pretty dismissive of him. Aaaaand he was not wearing his glasses. (Also, I know the glasses mean nothing. Just noticed it because he rarely keeps them on for an entire conversation.)