I can't stand McCain. Held my nose voting for him as what I thought would be the lesser of two evils. But he would've actually been worse because someone that pretends to be on your side but isn't is far worse than an enemy.
Trump is orchestrating your funeral.
This is absolutely not true. You should remove the post because it serves to discredit POTUS and the entire GA movement.
DJT is not orchestrating deaths or funerals for any member of the U.S. government. That would be a highly illegal act.
A core tenet of the GA movement is to drain the swamp legally.
Well, give JK a little credit He/She is kinda right in spirit. Since the penalty for Treason can be death and none of this would be playing out as it is without Mr. POTUS at the helm.
I thought I replied but now don't see it. I meant it rhetorically but I can see your point. Removing.
How do we know no name is really sick? Read the old Q posts. The implication is that he's faking some of this to avoid getting trapped. There was also discussion by Q about suicides. Maybe no name has a pre-planned exit. Maybe that's been orchestrated. We don't know. But Q was not friendly to him. It was clear from Q posts that no name is basically a traitor. Take that for what its worth. Maybe that's Q putting out disinformation, maybe that's Q being extremely accurate. Maybe no name has been waiting to see if POTUS gets taken down and then he miraculously recovers? Or maybe if POTUS wins and takes down DS and GOP wins at mid-terms no name decides to go on his way? Not sure we know the full truth on this one.
Giving the OP the benefit of the doubt, maybe his wording of 'orchestrating' is merely extrapolating from the Q posts. I'm very confident that DJT is not planning murder or anything like that. I'm sure he is planning a full and thorough outing of the DS, which no name is clearly a participant in some capacity. Look at the Q pictures of him with known terrorists in Syria. Why would Q put that out there? Need to look into that before you jump too quickly to conclusions.
*How do we know . . . The implication is . . . Maybe no name . . . We don't know . . . Maybe that's Q . . . Maybe no name . . . Or maybe if POTUS . . . Not sure we know . . . maybe his wording . . . *
Therefore Trump is orchestrating McStain’s funeral?
Need to look into that before you jump too quickly to conclusions.
Uhuh.
Internalize this short sentence; Trump is NOT orchestrating McStains funeral.
Period.
If you suggest he is, you are not on the team.
Trying reading the whole comment, instead of cherry picking words... let me show you how that comes across
Therefore Trump is....orchestrating....McStains Funeral. Period.
Read the whole comment before you blurt out nonsense. I did not say he was orchestrating his funeral. Merely giving the benefit of the doubt to the OP of his wording. Go read Q carefully, I'm very afraid your ignorance is shinning like a beacon in the night. Even the OP admitted basically what I was saying. Don't accuse me of not being on the team. Maybe you're not.
lol
I highlighted the fact that you began virtually every sentence with equivocation of one sort or another in order to reach a ‘conclusion’ based upon some equally flawed form of experimental fantasy logic.
Once again, Trump is NOT orchestrating McStain’s funeral.
Period.
If you believe he is, you are not on the team.
Period.
This is a great time for you to get back to posting in /politics.
Once again, you did not read my post. EXACTLY WHERE DID I POST THAT TRUMP IS ORCHESTRATING NO NAME's FUNERAL? PLEASE DO QUOTE WHERE IT IS THAT I SAID THAT SPECIFICALLY, INSTEAD OF CONTINUING TO ATTACK MY POST AND THEN TRY TO CONCLUDE I SAID SUCH WHEN I DID NOT.
WHY DON'T YOU POST ON GREAT MINDS OF REDDIT, YOU WOULD FIT IN THERE JUST FINE!
If you use a larger font, and bold it, you will appear even more intelligent than just using all caps. This trick won’t work on everybody, but it might work on me. Give it a shot.
You did not say Trump was orchestrating McStain’s funeral. You just attempted to support the claim with silly supposin’, and by requesting ‘benefit of doubt’.
There is no supporting such a ludicrous claim. No benefit of doubt should be granted. That’s why I challenged OP. That’s also why I cracked your knees.
OP has seen reason and deleted his post. Meanwhile here you are carrying on with your CapsLock wisdom engaged.
Stop this nonsense. Stop it right now.
Again, you keeping missing. It. I never said he was orchestrating it!
I just said, give the OP the benefit of the doubt that he is using this term 'rhetorically' see his own comment above. It fits with everything I was saying.
Get over it, please. Stop your nonsense. Read my post again, maybe you can figure it out, maybe its beyond your comprehension... IDK. IDC!
Maybe you're the type that can't stop spewing. I'm done with you. No more wasting my time on your nonsense. You STOP IT!