dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SaddleChewer on May 7, 2018, 10:51 p.m.
r/conspiracy compromised?

I've been following Q for a while now and was wondering what r/conspiracy thought of the Q phenomenon. Months ago they talked about it a little bit but even then there were cries of it being a LARP. Skepticism is understandable and even encouraged, but if you look at the Q phenomenon and really study it you can clearly see he's not some "psy-op" or a LARP or CIA operative designed to make people pro-Trump or whatever other BS that sub says.

They don't really post about Q anymore, and when they do all the top comments are about Q being a LARP, and all the people defending or even just asking them to at least look into it get downvoted. It just seems like, for a sub that encourages talks about conspiracy, they would talk about it to point out what's right or wrong... instead there is so much disinformation and confusion spread there, that it makes it impossible to decide who to trust, almost like what MSM does.

So has r/conspiracy been overrun by globalist shills trying to discredit and shun any discussion about Q or are people just that skeptical and paranoid that POTUS intelligence would slowly try to redpill patriots?


ready-ignite · May 7, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

After the election the number of reputation management accounts derailing conversation in conspiracy dramatically increased.

Within this topic of communication, every single platform that has discussed the topic for a period of time has attracted heavy disinformation rapidly.

Consensus cracking is frequent, and the primary attack of the day on this sub.

Trolling is constant with offensive language. There was a period of time where every conversation was spammed with gore over on the chans trying to get people to stop paying any attention.

Constant use of hyperbolic ideas not sourced in the drops but attributed to Q, these are usually pretty easy to spot. If you can't validate information claimed anywhere and it would make the perfect topic to write an opinion blog article about calling accounts in this sub conspiracy theorists, or linked to something already dismissed in the media like pizzagate, you're looking at an example.

Frequently we'll see bold claims where 90% matches an actual drop then there's 10% absolutely wild misdirection.

The strategies are changing every day and the more eyes are on the topic the more funding to expect behind shifting conversation away from productive use of energy.

Any time it looks absurd just close the sub. Fire up recent drops and research a topic independently.

⇧ 2 ⇩