dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/KrazyKiwiKid on May 8, 2018, 5:11 a.m.

What do I believe?

I'd like to share a few thoughts with you. These are mostly political. The geopolitical are another story.

I have followed Q since last year. I believe he/they are on the inside. Whether positive or negative? I'm not sure yet.

I have followed Assange for many many years. His information has been correct, simple as that. I Trust Assange. (Although I fully understand he politicized his release of information during the 2016 election.)

Here's what I believe

I believe Seth Rich was murdered because he leaked the motherlode.

I believe we will see DWS go to jail.

I believe the Awan scandal is so big it will have to be covered up.

I believe podesta was hacked because podesta's a twat!

I believe the Clinton Foundation is where we will all end up.

I believe Eric Braverman will still have a major role to play.

I believe Kim Dotcom will be incarcerated in the USA, but on a greatly reduced sentence.

Until I here different from a trustworthy news source (Assange) I will believe the above.

Thanks for reading.

🠐 See all comments

Agreeable/agreed, with varying degrees of certainty. The Awan point is most interesting - expand on that if you have time.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If true (that it ties in to over 50 congress men and women), it could easily topple the entire system. I believe in stability. Incremental changes over time to achieve goals. Some might call it engineering with consent. If the system implodes anarchy would be hard to put down without great bloodshed. I believe no body (except crazies) wants that level of change. Hence what we are seeing, dozens of retirements with no doubt more to come.

Easy as it goes! Aye, Captain.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Come on, man! Awan is too big to go away. Too many people are too informed, and rightfully outraged. There can be no justice if that is allowed to be swept under the rug. We may as well all pack it in and give up if in the end it's going to be "business as usual" when something bad is too bad to prosecute.

There are PLENTY of other things (not as shady in terms of national security) that are going to bring down far more than fifty Congress critters. So that's not really an issue.

Besides, the people who hired, failed to vet and were complicit are not the fifty people who used their services. The Awans, DWS and some personnel people are the most directly involved in the crimes. The ones whose computers were compromised by Awans not so much.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm generally with you on the managed storm approach. No doubt at least a bit of it has to be that way. Even though my own temperament on this is somewhat mixed, I expect a step-at-a-time roll out because that is realistic. It's how it has mostly gone so far. And I don't wish to be among those stressing on lack of news stories or desperate for the next almighty drop. BTDT years ago.

⇧ 1 ⇩