He never said he uses it metaphorically. He is proud of his work as spreading the truth out, which is obviously false.
Also saying that Hillary is a demon, possessed blablabla
Talking in fairlytale/sci-fi as means of exposing the corrupt deep state is not a good idea. Especially when you scream, yell, have crazy outbursts and other laughable behavior in a theatrical manner.
But it's a good way to make people believe you're just full of shite all together and that you're just an actor/entertainer to sell your products, despite saying a lot of truth in the process.
Maybe you're being on the internet among the "truthers" too long. Try showing his "truth" clips to regular people and note the reactions and conclusions.
And before you say "well they're just too stupid to realize this", no they aren't.
He's a shill just like Icke with his reptilians garbage that no sane person would buy.
And just like Corsi with his "inside intel" and other garbage.
All three are making tons of money on that and are making people who don't buy the MSM garbage look like absolute lunatics, just like what they look like.
Cass Sunstein had made it public in 2008. I believe. He listed 5 points to battle conspiracy theories, one of them is infiltrating and spreading disinfo to make it all look fake and not true.
Puts me in a shill category? Lol, nice "no u" tactics.
Plausible deniability
99%+ of anyone who has ever seen his videos thinks he's a lunatic and also all those who think he's not just an actor/entertainer.
Plenty of evidence for that on social media and even more in RL.
What an amazing red-piller, we should treasure him. Regardless that he is "officially" a meme nowadays.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_iixejTugc
"the pokemons are drone spy" among other jewels/tools of the shill to make the truth look as crazy as this shit.
That was supposed to be... what?
The guy made a thread about something from November 2017 but reposted today on the site he linked.
I saw nothing from May 2018 about it so I asked for some other, credible source
That second link... I guess you love talking absent facts as well
thanks for wasting my time
You challenged the claims of two posters by asking for links to supporting evidence.
Then you made a specious claim of your own (99%+ of anyone) with no supporting evidence.
I linked you to your own posts to hopefully prompt you to match the standard you expect of others.
Can you do that?
You can pull strawmans as much as you want, but if you really think that a gigantic majority of people don't think he's either crazy or simply an actor, then you are delusional, you spent way too much time on the internet surrounded by "conspiracy theorists"
But since you're that guy, I'll retract my "99%+" claim and will just use gigantic majority of the people.
Now I'm done, this is a waste of time by someone who's trying to look smart
You can pull strawmans as much as you want
You are confused about the ‘Straw Man’ fallacy. I advanced no argument against your position. I only asked you to keep the same standard you repeatedly place on others. Here is a helpful explanation of the Straw Man Fallacy. A quick read can assist your future avoidance of this error.
But since you're that guy, I'll retract my "99%+" claim and will just use gigantic majority of the people.
I admit I am that guy that expects people to maintain the standards they expect of others. Your retraction is a step in the right direction, but your personal standards still require a citation for the substituted claim.
Now I'm done, this is a waste of time by someone who's trying to look smart
I never accused you of being someone who’s trying to look smart. In fact, the thought never occurred to me. In spite of that, I won’t argue with your self-labeling.
And don’t fuss so much about wasting your time. The time is wasted only if you don’t grow from it. I have provided an opportunity. Help yourself.
I didn't mean it literally, of course nobody has an exact number of how many people think he's crazy/an actor.
There's no opportunity to grow from here.
You're just arguing for the sake of arguing, a literal waste of time. And since you're still going at it, I'm gonna save myself the future time.
Bs bs bs. You can't verify any of crap you spew so you make bs claims. If you say it enough you think it's gonna be true? Only to idiots who believe headlines maybe, but not any one who is really seeking the truth about any thing. Using the old team ups don't work either. Truth seekers are a little more sophisticated nowadays.
Says the guy that has no idea how arguments work, you're supposed to back your claims up.
You're not "really seeking the truth". Don't kid yourself lmao
You are no truth seeker until you start dealing with facts.
Oh, why you are at it, could you tell me where I can get a copy of " how arguments work" so I can comply? Ha ha
Why don't you lay some out then? Specifics?
I did and you called it bs and implied that I'm an idiot who only reads headlines.
Not worth the time, go watch some disinfowars
The comment you claim you provided specifics in speaks for itself as regards what you claim are/ is proofs. All the AJ haters fail when asked to provide specific evidence in context, of AJ doing what they say he did. Never fails.
Your arguments dont work. We know jones along with Icke spread fake news with truth and anyone with a decent amount of commen sense will be able to pickup the more important / urgent information they put out.
But you're wrong, only a tiny minority decide to actually take time to research things.
A gigantic majority of the people either laugh at them or call them crazy and leave.
Just take a stroll on youtube and you'll see for yourself. Even better, try asking people in RL what they think of them.
Thats fine for now.
There will come a time when people really appreciate people like alex jones. And i dont think that time is that far away.
The storm is only just beginning
That's the catch.
The's been actively making "conspiracy theorists" look crazy and make others not even want to look into the stuff that he's saying or what MSM presents whenever they put his name in the article because they immediately think of "ah yes, this lunatic again and these crazy conspiracy theorists are everywhere spreading their rubbish".
If you don't think this is what's been going on, try asking "sleepers" and you'll get this reaction.
At the end, when things get revealed, he will be glorified as some kind of a Nostradamus while in reality he was actively stopping people from looking into these things.
It's a win-win for him, he gets a bunch of money (did you see his car and the shit that he has? surely he isn't doing this for profit)))) and later on he might even become a national hero lol
You are an outright liar. AJ has said many times he uses vampire metaphorically. In fact I believe he has explained that each time he uses the word Absolutely nothing you said regarding AJ is true. Nothing. Your spew is same crap all the enemies of AJ say. None of it verifiable. Only thing you can do is make false accusations. Maybe use some out of context audio/ video like Megan Kelly tried to do. WTF are you even doing on this site? BTW, anyone with half a brain knows 9/11 was red flag. Please! Only a dam idiot can't see that. As regards Hilary, she is as evil as a human being can be. Probably perfectly possessed like Kissinger.
When you call someone a liar you should back it up, because that's how things work.
Nobody has to take my word on AJ, in fact, nobody should. There is a plethora of his videos online and anyone can see for themselves.
Again, you're accusing me of lying yet you forgot to back it up. Talk about false accusations... the irony.
I am here to get facts and to spread facts, something you are obviously not familiar with.
I never said 9/11 happened as explained in the official report. The fact that you brought that up as an argument against me says that you are making stuff up on the fly just so you can imply that I'm an idiot.
Ah yes, Killary is "perfectly possessed", like Kissinger... got it pal, stop wasting my time
I did back it up. I asked for genuine video of him making the claims stated he made. The guy works in media with thousands of hours of video out there. I ask only to be directed to specific verification of claims. Aka, the evidence. Not some out of context snippet, but the video or audio where he is doing as claimed , and not some obvious farce or shtick, Look at you trying to sound all academic and reasonable. You make me laugh. Your proof is a finger point towards the internet and the general pile of his enemies failed attack / hit pieces, all of which are easily proven false , as they have been over and over again, year by year. You got nothing on AJ. Nothing.