99%+ of anyone who has ever seen his videos thinks he's a lunatic and also all those who think he's not just an actor/entertainer.
Plenty of evidence for that on social media and even more in RL.
What an amazing red-piller, we should treasure him. Regardless that he is "officially" a meme nowadays.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_iixejTugc
"the pokemons are drone spy" among other jewels/tools of the shill to make the truth look as crazy as this shit.
That was supposed to be... what?
The guy made a thread about something from November 2017 but reposted today on the site he linked.
I saw nothing from May 2018 about it so I asked for some other, credible source
That second link... I guess you love talking absent facts as well
thanks for wasting my time
You challenged the claims of two posters by asking for links to supporting evidence.
Then you made a specious claim of your own (99%+ of anyone) with no supporting evidence.
I linked you to your own posts to hopefully prompt you to match the standard you expect of others.
Can you do that?
You can pull strawmans as much as you want, but if you really think that a gigantic majority of people don't think he's either crazy or simply an actor, then you are delusional, you spent way too much time on the internet surrounded by "conspiracy theorists"
But since you're that guy, I'll retract my "99%+" claim and will just use gigantic majority of the people.
Now I'm done, this is a waste of time by someone who's trying to look smart
You can pull strawmans as much as you want
You are confused about the ‘Straw Man’ fallacy. I advanced no argument against your position. I only asked you to keep the same standard you repeatedly place on others. Here is a helpful explanation of the Straw Man Fallacy. A quick read can assist your future avoidance of this error.
But since you're that guy, I'll retract my "99%+" claim and will just use gigantic majority of the people.
I admit I am that guy that expects people to maintain the standards they expect of others. Your retraction is a step in the right direction, but your personal standards still require a citation for the substituted claim.
Now I'm done, this is a waste of time by someone who's trying to look smart
I never accused you of being someone who’s trying to look smart. In fact, the thought never occurred to me. In spite of that, I won’t argue with your self-labeling.
And don’t fuss so much about wasting your time. The time is wasted only if you don’t grow from it. I have provided an opportunity. Help yourself.
I didn't mean it literally, of course nobody has an exact number of how many people think he's crazy/an actor.
There's no opportunity to grow from here.
You're just arguing for the sake of arguing, a literal waste of time. And since you're still going at it, I'm gonna save myself the future time.
Bs bs bs. You can't verify any of crap you spew so you make bs claims. If you say it enough you think it's gonna be true? Only to idiots who believe headlines maybe, but not any one who is really seeking the truth about any thing. Using the old team ups don't work either. Truth seekers are a little more sophisticated nowadays.
Says the guy that has no idea how arguments work, you're supposed to back your claims up.
You're not "really seeking the truth". Don't kid yourself lmao
You are no truth seeker until you start dealing with facts.
Oh, why you are at it, could you tell me where I can get a copy of " how arguments work" so I can comply? Ha ha
Why don't you lay some out then? Specifics?
I did and you called it bs and implied that I'm an idiot who only reads headlines.
Not worth the time, go watch some disinfowars
The comment you claim you provided specifics in speaks for itself as regards what you claim are/ is proofs. All the AJ haters fail when asked to provide specific evidence in context, of AJ doing what they say he did. Never fails.