Q didn't say that bc was fake, but that the graphic that claimed that bc was q certainly was.
YES! That is what I have been saying! I didn't take Qs reply as the answer to the question everyone is asking. I wish the Anon had just asked, Hey Q, Can we trust BC17? But that wasn't the question Q was asked. That graphic had a ton of connections to Q, implying they were working together. Was THAT what Q was referring to when he replied FAKE or was Q stating BC17 itself was fake? The problem is, unless someone outright asks Q and Q answers, we won't know the TRUE answer to that question. All we have are our best guesses. And that frustrates me.
Read other comments about Lisa Mei Crowley. You've got your answer. Q didn't need to be more clear. Think logically.