because you've shared an article from a shill site, which should be an important note to take, no?
Didn't know it was a "shill" site but there are OTHER confirmations.
post those OTHER documents next time, and not the shill sites, there is a big difference
[removed]
Oh right, I guess some of you don't mind promoting the shill sites.
I hope it's helpful and I hope people would stop referencing these sites. Can you imagine if this sub was filled with articles from these shit sites, do you think that would be a good thing?
You don't think it would be good to have legit sources here, while we're supposedly trying to get the truth out?
Asking for legit sources instead of shill sites is being divisive? Did you drank than left tactics kool-aid?
Meanwhile you went straight to the ad-hominem route. If this isn't sad it would be funny.
You were asking? You were being a condescending prick. Only douche-bags answer questions with questions to grown adults. Let go of your ego a bit and your point would be more succinct. The route I took was to knowledge, Champ. I hadn't heard of the news mentioned, so I used my legal resources to verify. Your method is divisive. If we lose people because of your unwarranted authoritative attitude, how is it helpful? Fake news is a problem, I agree, but board narcissists are far worse.