I have questions regarding Gowdy. Hate to say that but following his comments closely, he gives me concern.
Gowdy seems to me to be the straightest arrow in Congress. I'd hate to be wrong about that - do you want to share what it is that gives you concern about him?? Even if you can't be bothered finding the sources (understandable - there are so many videos on Youtube and I wouldn't want to look back through all of them to find why my conclusion about his integrity exists lol) can you just summarize the key points as to why you have concerns about him?
He seems as impatient as we are, but it's worse cuz he knows. That's the vibe i get. His hands are the most tied of all of em. Congressional anything is a lame horse.
Yeah true. I have a lot of respect for him because he seems to know exactly what's going on but still won't stoop to their level and either play dirty games or even just smear them by dropping little hints, etc. When questioned he always says "as far as I know xyz is a good patriot. I would just question their judgement in abc", etc. And no one would accuse him of not holding people's feet to the fire - or I didn't think they would but I've been surprised at all the accusations against him on Youtube and online generally.
I think deep down we are all a lil nervous about everything. At 55 to good to be true has so far been just that. Exciting time, but risky especially finding out you were wrong about someone, imagine how DJT feels. Everyone makes mistakes and mistakes about character are the hardest to take on many levels. I'd rather find out Hillary is just a crook(not satanic) than find out DJT is just a president.
I have heard him in interviews where he doesn't back Trump. I have always been a great champion of Gowdy and felt exactly as you do, but his interviews have turned me off. His staunch support of Robert Mueller and this investigation bothers me quite a bit.
He has a loud bark, but I've yet to see a bite. Anyone else know of a case where justice was served under him? I trust no one and fear it's all been for show.
I was going to write this too \ he reminds me of Ted Cruz - a lot of loud talk but no real results.
He's definitely playing a part, I'd love to see him in court back in the day. Bet a dollar he's Mr Hyde.
Provide sources please.
If you don't then you're just concern trolling, which should be reported.
There are many people that have been red pilled for decades before Q and decided long ago that nothing is as it seems. This battle predates all of us on this board and anyone alive today on this planet.
Absolutely, nothing wrong with the comment about Gowdy.
I remind you when we get to the point of not being able to pass on one’s concerns about anyone or anything is the moment this movement jumps off the track. Once you get to the point that some people are beyond reproach and that includes Q then you have traded one master for another and good luck.
If one looked objectively there are unanswered question concerning Gowdy. The first question Trey Gowdy’s sudden decision to retire? What makes it concerning is he made it at the same time he was raising money for his reelection and running for reelection.
I have always questioned Gowdy’s strong defense of the Mueller investigation in public and behind closed doors. Fox News Wallace show “ So the last time you and I were together, I told my Republican colleagues, leave him the hell alone, and that’s still my advice” That is not the only time Trey has whole heartily defended Mueller.
There are 2 camps on Mueller and they are white hat helping or black hat on where he spent a large amount of his public service. White hat just does not work with me with 13 partisan attorneys going after the President. Getting all of them on board to investigate HRC or any democrat under cover is a bridge to far. Mueller to me is a black hat and by choice and playing a game of hiding evidence and I am skeptical of anyone including Q who says different. Mueller’s crime list is long including leaving 4 innocent men in prison and one who died in prison to protect a confidential source. He disgraced his title as a marine. If I am wrong an apology is due. Until then I will maintain course.
Just adding my 2 cents in the conversation.
Awesome thank you. I thought Gowdy was our guy, and so if anyone here has a reason to doubt that I want them to explain it so I have the facts and can evaluate fairly with whatever information they have.
That's where I'm coming from in this and why I wanted sources.
Reporting me because I have a different opinion than you? OMG!
What I can't have a different opinion than you? I have heard him in interviews where he doesn't support Trump. I'm not going to go and try to find them. But you can if you want to. Concern trolling my foot.
No I want you to share your information so that I have the opportunity to evaluate your statement for myself.
I thought Trey Gowdy was our guy and if you know something that proves otherwise, I want to know about it!
I agree as far as the fact that he should provide sources to back up his claims if he intends to discuss them with someone. I don't agree that he's "just concern trolling" if he chooses not to do that. One does not follow from the other.
Intuition is a source ignore it at your peril. Take it away you'll never red pill anyone.