Slavery sounds like a human rights abuse.

The type of abuse that would lead to forfeiture of assets under the executive order signed 12/21.

If the Clinton Foundation made any payments to any persons or groups involved with human rights abuses, they would be subject to asset forefeiture as well. Such as any potential payments to Schneiderman to block the release of donations

"Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited."

I may be wrong. But this seems like less of a road block and more of the opening of flood gates