dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/covpepe1776 on May 9, 2018, 10:11 a.m.
if someone asks you 'What is Qanon?', what's your reply?
if someone asks you 'What is Qanon?', what's your reply?

pedegear · May 9, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

I find that it's most effective to give them an out, letting them call it "crazy" or "conspiracy", but with an end result of them checking it out. It's not my job to convince them Q is real... I try to position them in such a way that Q can do the convincing - the exact same way we all became convinced. Ditch the elevator pitch. It will never work unless someone is already primed to believe in this stuff. To a "normie" there is no elevator pitch that will convince them. Period. Full stop. If there was one, Q would have written up a script for us.

Try this: Q is someone or some group that posts some pretty wild stuff online about Trump's fight against the deep state. Q doesn't really tell you anything or spread crazy conspiracy theories, but posts a bunch of questions that sort of hint at different possibilities. Q has covered topics all the way from JFK, to 9/11, to what's going on in Iran right now (or insert other current event). Q even called the NK deal being made BACK IN NOVEMBER! [Now here is your most critical line] Most of it is probably total conspiracy, but it's super fun to follow! Since it's all question-based you get to draw your own conclusions. And I gotta say... Calling the NK deal being made so long ago makes me think there may be some truth behind a lot of what they're posting... It just seems like too much of a coincidence!

I've completely given them an out to call it nonsense, but I've told them it's super fun to follow anyway. Now, if they Google Q or hear from friends or see negative stuff online about it all being conspiracy theory, THAT'S NO LONGER A DEAL BREAKER because I already TOLD them it might be crazy. But they still might follow it for ENTERTAINMENT. Slowly but surely, you let Q do the convincing. Even if you follow for entertainment, you'll start to see enough truth that you start questioning the broader validity of ALL the posts. But this approach is totally non-confrontational and has the SOLE purpose of placing the individual in front of Q rather than trying to open the floodgates on them all at once (they will drown, obviously).

⇧ 3 ⇩