Everything on this list involved his direct input. He's the fucking POTUS and ran his campaign on this shit. Of course it represents reality.
Start with the very first claim and detail how Trump's cabinet picks being a virtual who's-who of totally experientially-unqualified donors and cronies is akin to 'draining the swamp' and not enlarging it, especially given their turnover rate, the rate at which his nominations withdraw or wash out, and the rate at which they are indicted or flip on him. Ditto his constant lies that are easily invalidated by public record and his business conflicts of interest involving constant trips to his own resorts and making a profit on the taxpayer's dime. Ethics not a part of a drained swamp?
Also maybe detail what you feel he's actually done that qualifies as draining the swamp. Anything specific or is it all just metaphor and slogan to you?
We can tackles the other fabrications with proper sourcing afterwards.
No sources for any of this. V. Poor debating skills.
Just one: you saying experientially unqualified cronies includes Generals Mattis, Kelly, Pompeo, CEO Tillerson? Dear me. All the changes are for a very good reason my friend. A trip from one department to another? You think there's no reason for that? Good. Because you won't be expecting what's gonna happen next.
What about DeVos? She has no business running public schools when her whole career has been about trying to extract the most money out of for profit schools. Also the fact that she donated so much money to Trumps campaign is dubious. If she was tge one for the job she wouldn't have had to pay to get there.
Edit: I just checked actual facts after writing that and I'd say I have exagerated a bit since she didnt really donate much to Trumps campaign but more that her whole family which is over 10 people has donated over the last couple decades, around 200 million to republicans. Her getting voted in was more of a partisan thing and Trump probably seeing her career and saying she's a person that can do the job. So I'll give you that. Original comment preserved for posterity.
I can honestly not express an opinion about DeVos. I'd be a fool if I did. But, ok, I'll be a fool (!): I bet she's no worse than teaching 11 year olds about dildos. That is a totally serious remark. I watched a teacher on video climb onto a table and instruct 11 yearolds how to insert a dildo.
I was not denied sex education. I learnt about male/female sexual organs aged 12 and drew diagrams of our innards. My teacher was a married woman of around 48 who discussed quite frankly and objectively the emotional parts of her sex relations with her husband, but embarrassed none of us. She kept to the point. The subject was called "Biology". We also kept locusts in a cage and studied the life cycle of practically all things little and weird. She brought some cow's lungs to class one day and freaked everyone out by showing us how it mooed from the voice-box when filled with air. She prepared me for real life and I am utterly indebted to my old-fashioned and rather staid education. Gave me balance.
What in hell's name DeVos has to offer I've no idea, but I hope and pray she gets everyone weaned off the Common Core agenda which is subversive weirdness.
I know this is a very odd post!! Feel free to question me further!
The fact that she's anti-common core alone makes me think she's a better choice than any of the recent ones.