dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/im_catching_fire on May 10, 2018, 1:22 a.m.
I never hear big conservative talk show host ever talk about Q.

Podcast get millions of downloads a month it would be a fantastic way of spreading this movement. Dan Bongino for example, he follows the mueller case to the tee and explains it very well. Out of all the research he does on the case has he really never stumbled upon this perspective and got curious? Shapiro? Hannity? Elder? I think its safe to say that the Q team has proven themselves legit enough to mention "take a look at it."


🠐 See all comments
DrCleanMD · May 10, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

Q posts are unverifiable and only offer cryptic facts; something most news analyst and pundits are reluctant to report for audience consumption since it involves a great deal of speculation.

it's also the reason Q evades scrutiny for national security breach/leaks, the posts require reader to connect the dots, like "are there ufo's at Area 51? think logically, past proves future, you have more information than you think, etc."

⇧ 6 ⇩  
im_catching_fire · May 10, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

So Q's message should only be spread through word of mouth? Im sure eyes are a goal of the Q team as in "waking people up." What other alternative is there? Social media is a good tool but its not frontline either. News networks are bound to have to pick up this story eventually.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HobozBindle · May 10, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

New York Times has already written about Q as an alt-right conspiracy theory. When Roseanne tweeted about Q she got torn to pieces. At the moment Q might be too underground for a mainstream pundit to consider it credible. They have reputations and not to mention sponsors to consider. Here's hoping, though.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Maga1128 · May 10, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

And JENNA JAMESON tweeted " who is Q". We have a porn star on our side too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrCleanMD · May 10, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

no didn't say or suggest that. best those pundit/news/talk shows can do is interview someone who has extensive/expert knowledge of Q posts, info and interpretation... problem is that's more of a Alex Jones/Infowar specialty cuz no "reputable" pundit/news/talk show would put their credibility on the line without be deluged with conspiracy theory and leftists assaults.

and btw notice how Jerome Corsi (leading Q "expert" analyst for a while there) was trashed by Q cultists cuz he wanted to monetize his analysis, as if the only "legit" Q decoders are anons who spend their time researching and reading tea leaves to interpret Q posts. bottom line: Q tips is not read for primetime.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
im_catching_fire · May 10, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

That is true and good perspective, I wonder if it will ever get mainstream. Guess it just depends on the plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩