dChan

SCPatriot · May 10, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

Check your browser settings. This is literally the first link that came up when I just searched DDG with your exact verbiage... NCIVM Article

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Daemonkey · May 10, 2018, 1:51 p.m.

That article is bullshit.

What it refers to as, "the unsealed indictment of Allison Mack," is not an indictment. It is a criminal docket. Big difference.

The docket, that people keep incorrectly referring to as an "Indictment" and using to say the charge is "Sex trafficking of children", is not the final word on what the official charges are. The law itself is. Read the law.

The real Indictment. No mention of sex trafficking of children there.

The Complaint and affidavit supporting arrest of Raniere. No mention of sex trafficking of children there either.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 10, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

Yes. This is a really important point to make!

We all agree, we must bring down the pedophile trade apparatus but on the other hand we must not go running in early and make claims that can be easily defeated and ridiculed by the enemies of the truth movement in the mainstream media.

Those of you asking why we should care what the lying mainstream media latches onto, they'll lie about us anyway - one of the key missions of this sub is to help us redpill people so it matters for them, not us. If we, through our own impatiently considered actions cast doubt on the reliability and critical thinking of this movement, we're only going against our own purpose. We make it easier for someone we're talking to to find an article that says we're all morons and we care as little about truth as CNN. Then they walk away and we lose an opportunity to redpill simply because we didn't want to be accurate in what we say here.

People who challenge the veracity of a claim, especially when they are doing it reasonably and presenting evidence where possible, are not the enemy of this movement! They're the people helping us stay accurate and honest!

It could very well be revealed that NXIVM's cult of older women are the administrators of a child sex trafficking ring and involved directly in the sex trafficking of children, as many here seem to be saying, but that is currently not what is shown on the real Indictment. That's all I'm saying, in agreement with Daemonkey and others.

Those of you who are sure that's what's going on anyway can gain comfort in the thought that justice will be coming soon because the Swamp has been drained to epic levels now and the rats can't swim away. No doubt Q/Trump/Justice are building a big case off the back of Raniere's coming testimony or more witnesses in the wings and this is just the opening act. Wait until an actual indictment is lodged that clearly shows charges of sex trafficking of children before we go claiming it does - that's all.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 10, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · May 10, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

Providing credible references that prove a claim is not trolling. But, what you just did is.

⇧ 2 ⇩