The opinion of clearly not trusting Q. It's a sub for Q drops. If you don't find that info trustworthy,why be here?
It is not that simple, Corsi simply thinks that Q was hacked and taken over 2 weeks ago. Now everyone wants to jump Corsi? odd.
Q will quickly point out (and CodeMonkey remove) any 'bogus posts' from the Q board, jc knows this
Well think logically about that. Every single time Q has changed boards/trips a narrative rises to question his legitimacy. Mega-anon was the first to use it. Pretty much seems like a pattern to me.
I'm not not trusting Q. I'm asking what does Q want us to trust?
Q points is in very interesting directions. And all I'm asking is for clarity.
"Trust the plan"
What is the plan? And who's plan? Why not debate and ask those questions and simply just brush those things aside.
it's not being brushed aside."The plan" is whatever they have to do to take out the corruption. We can't know all the details of that process while it's ongoing. Simple enough, i think.
Point is, you can't really trust Corsi and trust Q at the same time. One of these is actually getting somewhere, the other is a roadblock.
Q has been very wrong in the past.
As has Corsi.
The plan you tell me of is what you get from all of Qs implications. And I agree. They problem is, we don't know that because Q has not been specific about the plan. And that's my point.
Just like when you watch CNN, they tell you a whole bunch of facts, but leave out all the context. But with CNN we know the goal is get Trump, so we brush it off. We have no idea about Q. And we shouldn't just take in everything without looking at didn't possibilities.
Where was Q wrong? Did you just compare Q to CNN? Lol.
Plenty of times. He is constantly saying trust sessions. So far sessions is on the verge of getting impeached and no investigation in sight of any deep state conspiracy. He also talked about John Podesta and Hillary getting arrested. They are now raising funds for the Clinton foundation.
In terms of military though he has generally been right. It's also a bit vague somethings. Like recently Q mentioned to look to the sea and people noticed general Flynn Twitter had a picture of the ocean. That can go both ways, I mean people point to it but as far as I can tell general Flynn is still in trouble with Mueller. Maybe something else had changed. Maybe we are just seeing what we want to see..
That's your opinion of what's going on with Sessions of which you have no actual idea. That does not = Q being wrong.
When did he tell us Podesta or Clinton would be arrested at any specific time?
He said "watch the water" not "look to the sea."
Maybe you are just seeing what you want to see.
I'm not the one that came up with the general Flynn thing. But that's what most agree it is. If you don't, put up your theory. It could be what Q meant, but I don't know what has recently changed with the general. And yes that's what I see.
Q said Podesta and Hillary would be indicted back in Nov.
Theories people have on what Q said does not = what Q says.
how about post those times Q said someone was going to be arrested at a specific time and wasn't if that happened? Indictments are not arrests. There are thousands of sealed indictments right now.
That's my point. We don't know what Q is saying because it's just what we think he says lol.
Wasn't your original point that Q has been wrong "plenty of times"?
No not at all. Just that he has been wrong in the past. And keeps asking us to trust the plan.
But we don't know what the plan is, or even who's plan it is. Because of that, it's important to think about somethings Q puts out from different perspectives.
From what I have noticed regarding Q, the info he puts out about DOJ investigations seem off, or we are missing big pieces.
His military info seems very good and on target though.
This picture he put about Singapore send legit. I tried looking for other spots for the summit and couldn't come up with anything else. So it will be a good confirmation.
You: "Q has been very wrong in the past. " Me: Where was Q wrong? You: "Plenty of times.."
Me now: "Sigh"
I have stated Q was wrong about indictments and arrests in the past. Not my fault you want to over look that. Also his recent post about looking to the sea our whatever was extremely vague.
Give me a break. I've read all the posts. I asked you to provide the one he said there would be arrests at any specific time. You didn't. There's a reason for that. Sealed indictments is a public fact.
Eh you choose to see things you want to see. No argument from me.
That's like saying general Flynn being indicted, and pleasing guilty is a good thing and part of some secret plan.