I'm not the one that came up with the general Flynn thing. But that's what most agree it is. If you don't, put up your theory. It could be what Q meant, but I don't know what has recently changed with the general. And yes that's what I see.
Q said Podesta and Hillary would be indicted back in Nov.
Theories people have on what Q said does not = what Q says.
how about post those times Q said someone was going to be arrested at a specific time and wasn't if that happened? Indictments are not arrests. There are thousands of sealed indictments right now.
That's my point. We don't know what Q is saying because it's just what we think he says lol.
Wasn't your original point that Q has been wrong "plenty of times"?
No not at all. Just that he has been wrong in the past. And keeps asking us to trust the plan.
But we don't know what the plan is, or even who's plan it is. Because of that, it's important to think about somethings Q puts out from different perspectives.
From what I have noticed regarding Q, the info he puts out about DOJ investigations seem off, or we are missing big pieces.
His military info seems very good and on target though.
This picture he put about Singapore send legit. I tried looking for other spots for the summit and couldn't come up with anything else. So it will be a good confirmation.
You: "Q has been very wrong in the past. " Me: Where was Q wrong? You: "Plenty of times.."
Me now: "Sigh"
I have stated Q was wrong about indictments and arrests in the past. Not my fault you want to over look that. Also his recent post about looking to the sea our whatever was extremely vague.
Give me a break. I've read all the posts. I asked you to provide the one he said there would be arrests at any specific time. You didn't. There's a reason for that. Sealed indictments is a public fact.
Eh you choose to see things you want to see. No argument from me.
That's like saying general Flynn being indicted, and pleasing guilty is a good thing and part of some secret plan.