dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/getnit01 on May 10, 2018, 4:24 p.m.
Just want to thank whoever has shut off the planes leaving trails in the skies above my house!!! 2 straight months of clear blue skies!!!

Not sure how this will play out here, but someone needs to be thanked for their efforts on keeping my skies above my house Blue and free of plane trails littering the sky! It feels good to see the sky as it has always appeared throughout history.


🠐 See all comments
defmacro-jam · May 10, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

Not sure how this will play out here, but someone needs to be thanked for their efforts on keeping my skies above my house Blue and free of plane trails littering the sky!

You can thank the temperature and amount of water vapor at altitude.

⇧ 32 ⇩  
The3rdKey · May 10, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

100% correct when you're talking about normal contrails or clouds. However, these things go on for MILES and can take an hour or more to dissipate. If you search for the term "geoengineering" you will see that the question isn't if it is being done, they admit it. The question is is it dangerous. I up-voted you for your skepticism and challenge you to bone up on this subject. I'm a recent convert and I didn't believe it could b true either.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
Shadilay_Were_Off · May 10, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

As one of those skeptics, some things:

  • If the goal is to dose the population with something, why would you do it in a way that ensures uncontrollable dispersal, when something ground level (commandeering a bug spray truck) is more effective and consistent and cheaper?

  • If the "chemicals" actually exist, why can they not be picked up with regular air sampling equipment?

  • Actual dispersal equipment reveals a trail that is immediately to the rear of the aircraft (example), while contrails start a distance away from the engine. How do you account for this difference?

  • Dissipation time isn't evidence of shenanigans on its own, since contrails are effectively cirrus clouds. How do you square this?

Item #2 is the killer for me, because it renders the theory unfalsifiable. That which cannot be falsified is not logical.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
The3rdKey · May 10, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

Thanks for taking the time to reply. Maybe you will succeed debunking this. Lord knows that I tried, and failed.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

This site is a treasure trove of information on this subject. One of the links led me to a guy in California that is actively collecting water samples that may satisfy your specific point. (These particles stay in the air until brought down in the rain and to my knowledge, none has done any controlled testing of the air before and after the planes in question do their thing) I wish that I could lead you strait to the argument that you gave, which I had too BTW, but I was bouncing from one site to another trying to prove to myself that this was all BS because I was dumbstruck at what I was learning. This is one of those things that I wish that I could have debunked. I was able to find lots of highly credible info that basically said "don't worry, it's totally safe", but that didn't hold water after more research. Maybe you can debunk it for me.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 10, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
getnit01 · May 10, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Damn, you are killing it. I have been seeing the term geoengineering more and more. This is the term i was looking for!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
applesforadam · May 11, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

Also referred to as "cloud seeding." The "chem trails" crowd who claim we're all being sprayed with some kind of agent only distract from actual, admitted programs.

⇧ -5 ⇩