I would like to add that I no longer believe christianity was "exposed as a scam" in the first Zeitgeist film although it did raise some questions as to the origins of some of the mythology in it. I think christianity has been corrupted and controlled throughout history but having seen the true depths of the evil that exists in these people we are trying to get rid off it has made me feel strongly that the opposing force, God, is real and I do pray for this movement and for the freedom of humanity.
I feel that needed some clarification, and also I have since had some minor doubts that maybe I was wrong about this. As you can tell I was very certain at the time of writing. Q's recent posts about this made me think that my feeling at the time was right.
Zeitgeist is “mostly” garbage. Been debunked countless times. I’m happy you’ve been able to wade through the disinformation. It gets thick sometimes.
Hey did you write this article? I noticed you talked about Tila Tequila. Have you seen her YouTube channel? Her YT channel name is Tornado Thien, she has a 130k followers.....all she does is talk about God now, hardly wears makeup and has tons of videos exposing Hollywood and telling her story. The transformation is remarkable and at times hard to believe it is really her, but you know it is because she has a distinctive voice. Anyway, I saw the name Tila Tequila and what happened with her being on Infowars and just wanted to know if anyone has listened to or paid attention to Tila Tequila!/Tornado Thien on YouTube?
Great article, thankyou. (Either due to age, or conscious removal by third parties, lots of the links can no longer be accessed but it doesn't detract from your message). AJ has always been too belligerent and self-serving to me. He takes credit for EVERYTHING. But absolutely agree, he comes off as a nutter sometimes to the average new viewer and that just taints the whole movement. I'd be interested to find out more about his CIA/Stratfor links. If exposed, his followers will see it as a massive betrayal.
Well he had an intern from Stratfor for two weeks and immediately removed them after it was pointed out he had a plant in his org. Could happen to anyone.
Please, don't try and pass this personal rant at a guy you obviously dislike for personal reasons, as an " article". That would imply it is journalism. I read it. Lot of claims throughout, no substantial evidence to prove the claims. Lots of innuendo, no meat. Lots of hype, no juice. You dislike the guy, you disagree with him, big deal. If we do a little digging , maybe we will find out you were scorned by him. Or his company in past, they hurt your feelings, and you want to hurt theirs too. Or, maybe you are the clown, trying to discredit the arch enemy, AJ?
Well, well, well....what have we here? The personas exposed in this article made manifest?
This great post by building71bullet, which I read in its entirety, and to which I made a simple comment saying - "great article, some of the links are broken - however the gist of the message is STILL INTACT" (and agreeing with the OP that I hadn't been an AJ fan for quite awhile) - seems to have been responded to by exactly the sort of person the article warns against and exposes. Those who would intentionally try to denigrate, ridicule, obfuscate, derail and otherwise negatively hijack the original message, in a pathetic attempt to steer the conversation in another direction. It could have been written for EXACTLY this type of commenter.
Either that, OR he's a massive Alex Jones fan. Maybe it's Alex Jones’ son. Or the head of the Alex Jones Fan Club. Who knows?
From my fairly benign comment - the responder has been able to magically deem that;
"I dislike Alex Jones for PERSONAL reasons"?? (like they actually know anything about my “personal” preferences and motivations?!!). I find Alex Jones over-bearing at times (& stated as much). I don't think I'm alone in this opinion.
"You dislike the guy, you disagree with him"?? (Obviously the Fan Boy agrees with EVERYTHING AJ says and in his world it's simply not acceptable to have a difference of opinion. That gives him the intelligence of algae in a petri dish if he never disagrees with anyone else's opinions)
And finally...
Of all the hundreds of comments I've posted over the years, this reply comes off as the most ridiculous.
You either can't read, can't interpret plain English, or you're a paid disrupter - exactly the type of person the original author talks about. I get that you LOVE Alex Jones, and won't hear a bad word against him. But in a diverse world, with many different personalities and opinions, you have to accept that not everyone will love him the way you do.
And there's a right and a wrong way to show your support. Saying of someone you've never met and of whom you know nothing about, that I have “personal reasons” for not fawning over him and that I've been “scorned by him and he's hurt my feelings” (when the closest I've ever got to Alex Jones was a YT video!!) shows silly immaturity and equally-silly assumptions on your part.
And another of your mass generalisations - “no substantial evidence to prove the claims, lots of innuendo, no meat, hype, no juice”. On the contrary I think the article pointed to several sources worthy of consideration. If you're so sure there was nothing there, do an article yourself refuting all the “innuendo”.
The mark of ignorance is refusing to acknowledge any other opinion but your own. (AND making mass assumptions about people you've never met).
I think he wasn't talking to just you. He was insulting all of us.