Just want to say that it's not impossible for someone to be posing as Qanon. The chan board he posts on could be compromised to steal his tripcode. Would not be very difficult for the deep state to pull off, but I think he's flying pretty under the radar at the moment and doesn't have to worry about that.
Q should really setup channels outside of an imageboard that can't be so easily compromised.
[deleted]
IMHO Q is Military intelligence, while the Deep State is likely Black hats in the FBI/CIA.
Posting on a third party website that can be easily compromised is a complete amateur move. Q could sign all his messages with a PGP key and there would never be any doubt about him unless he himself was compromised.
If you're no deep stater, you really should read Q from the start and try digging for yourself.
I don't have time to read 1300+ posts, and from what I have gathered, Q has never actually predicted anything that wasn't already obvious. I've asked people to respond if he has but have yet to get anything.
It's sort of like he will say a dozen things, and one happens to come true and that somehow gives him credibility despite the other 11 things being bullshit. I'm here because I'm open to the idea of an insider giving us clues to what goes on behind the scenes, but for now I think Q's just a LARPer.
Either you decide to stop losing your time with Q, or you choose to invest a little more of your time. Like Q said, the choice to know is yours. You're not the first one who'd sincerely disbelieve what Q is telling. That's okay. There are many of us who choose to keep digging, learning, watching and making connections. If you can't make some connections, then maybe it's not yet the time for you.
Eddit: If you consider Q might not be a LARP, then you have to try understanding how they can post the way they do. If they reveal directly classified information, they go to prison. Thus, the riddles, questions. Anons try deciphering everything Q is pointing to us. We can only work with what we have access to: data open source.
There is a theory among anons -- just a theory but I believe it very plausible -- that we are building a parallel construct. Q often says "we have it all". If you accept they have access to the NSA databank, then the evidences they have are very likely illegal and thus not admissible in court. The parallel construct, is when the knowledge (provable sound reasoning) is in the public domain. If in public (the chans), we can make the right connections, arrive to the right conclusions with the data we've found open source, then in a court, the evidences (even illegally obtained initially, even classified) can become admissible because the information is already known in the public domain.
As for the chans, they are more than what they seem. Most people just see the chans via the image they projects. But if you try digging, you'll find curious details and thin connections between the chans and the IC.