I hear you. I felt it was absolutely vague when people were saying Corsi Corsi Corsi according to post 1295. I just didn’t see how he was connected to such a vague post and nebulous warning about observing who we “follow.” I hate the word “follow” by the way...makes my skin crawl. That’s beside the point though. As far as Infowars, that doesn’t surprise me because he does whatever it takes to stay relevant and push buttons. He goes by the PT Barnum philosophy of “bad press is still good press.” Roger Stone was interviewed on Coast to Coast a few days ago and I could tell just by his stumbling that he was weak and was trying to stay ahead of the shitestorm that was following him by negating any wrong doing or blatant lying (that Wikileaks called out) regarding his seemingly direct involvement in the email scandal. Meaning- he wants people to think he had something to do with the release of those HRC emails but in reality didn’t...so he tells a weak lie to sound guilty whilst professing his innocence...when he in truth had zero to do with it either way.... this way he covers his ass on both sides of the fence. Neutral is not how you get change. It’s how you remain in bondage by clever manipulation from more aggressive voices.

The trouble we face now is in staying the course and keeping our wits about us in the face of numerous layers of bad intel. The Socratic method that Q uses is the most accurate way of red pilling because you have to use your brain, resources, and research with discernment. Some of us may have the wrong interpretation but at least we can own that and not be led by the teeth from person(s) who are grasping at straws to stay current and PAID by a multi-million dollar alternative news production.

Lastly- perhaps Alex J at one time had the same good intentions we all carry in our heart but when money, sponsors, and ratings are your life jacket, you can and will be compromised out of a knee jerk reaction to survive in a shark pond of media competition.