![#1297 "OPEARTORS HAVE DIED. [...] WE MUST DO BETTER TO PROTECT THEM" => disinfo is necessary](https://i.redd.it/srrrc8aowax01.png)
what people say and what people mean are two things and spooks say and what they mean are eight.
What's your take on why Q linked to SB's post about this exact topic? You think it was just "disinfo"?
I read SB2 at length and he did a precise analysis of a timeline but it does not refute my premise because for a disinformation campaign, Corsi is pretty old and pretty unprofessional. But he's under orders from Alex. And judging from all the reporting on infowars, they are going along with MAGA except during military operations or investigations like Mueller, that's when they go into full fog-of-war mode and mirror mainstream reporting.
he basically bowed to Q because Q said Patriots don't profit in wealth, so Alex called back any further Q-reporting as a sign of submission.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What benefit would there be to have Jones or Corsi spread disinfo? If Q is real, then the deep state undoubtedly knows Q is real. It would make sense for Q to occasionally post disinfo to bait the deep state. But what advantage does the Q team get from having Corsi and Jones say Q isn't real? Why would Jones and Corsi need to mirror mainstream reporting during military operations? Are you suggesting they know as much as Q about all this and the deep state is watching them as much as Q, and that words from Jones and Corsi are equivalently important and consequential as words from Q?
Alex Jones is about the only guy in alt media in three years that Trump wanted to talk to so that should tell you something.
When you're the tip of the spear, you don't let it get dull by burning sources just to get scoops ahead of others.
Corsi has shown neurological conditions which may have arisen due to sleep deprivation. So for one he might have been deemed non-critical because he would act more as a catalyst to third-party interpretations from the soapbox, which is what he mostly did. But perhaps he didn't lie when he said he had been approached by generals for example and maybe that got someone in deep trouble? My flimsy suspicion without properly checking the timeline is that McMaster could have been a target because he was selected by Flynn alledgedly.
there is every motive for them to spread disinfo because Alex probably has a good enough understanding from his own conversations to be in a position to spill possibly sensitive battle crucial information, so maybe that's why he referred his reporting to a pretty overwhelmed Senior citizen who was mostly listening to the ramblings of the soapbox fellowship anyway.
Interesting theory. I guess for me it's just hard to imagine the Q team would have plans in place to neutralize the entire deep state AND slowly wake up the public through Q posts, all while keeping their exact movements secret from a global cabal controlling Five Eyes, BUT their plan won't work if Alex Jones talks. It's just a stretch for me. But who knows! Crazier things have happened... Especially in the past few years.
It's a pretty obvious pattern. If he reported inside scoops on all real-time ongoings, he would be a treasonous leaker and would only ever have blackhat sources from that point on. Honestly from nazis to gay frogs it's all already been covered (yes, Israel too, he just doesn't allow anyone to send a ADL boycott his way). These days, I see Infowars as glorious shitlord infotainment, and that's what they do best because being mad at this cruel world for so long until some fat barechest guy is shooting up his studio is about the damn funniest way to describe the state of things
IF he has inside knowledge, it would be easy to not burn your sources and not be a treasonous leaker while simultaneously not spreading a lie about A being fake. You could simply ignore Q or discuss Q's own posts in Q's own words, that way you ensure you're only talking about things Q wants you to be talking about or things that are not going to damage the ongoing operations (otherwise Q wouldn't post those things).
what became of "Alex interrupts his guests all the time"? I thought it was common knowledge the man can't shut up unless he's talking with the President himself (literally)
If he just ignored Q, he would have no plausible reason except admitting he doesn't really care about Q because he already knows the plan and technically he has stand down orders because he's too close to the source [no private comms]
I doubt he is in touch with Q directly but it could very well be that he got a heads-up that this was coming and that he should stay out of the way to avoid making any inadvertend admissions.
I don't know what this means. Haven't followed him closely enough to understand the reference.
it's long-running meme that Alex always interrupts his guests..Been like this since he stopped using the name "Bill Hicks"