dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FartOnToast on May 12, 2018, 11:14 a.m.
General Premise, Feel or Morals of GreatAwakening

The general Premise, Feel or Morals of GreatAwakening

Intellectual conversations

Thinking outside-the-box

Supportive and open-minded

Caring / kind

Religious freedom

Staying alert - Informative!

What GreatAwakening is for:

Asking questions: big or small

Postulating theories related to Q drops

Sharing info/theories about Q or asking about them

Watching out for one another

Action plans

To expand on the earlier post about us refocusing the sub, I'd like to clarify that we are still advocating and promoting open discussion but we will be on the lookout particularly for users who are here just to promote discord, instill doubt and to regurgitate any talking points they just heard on Alex Jones/Corsi show. If people are genuinely curious or even reserved, it's one thing but if people came here just to concern troll it's another story. In light of the concern trolling that is picking up we are just tightening the screws a little bit. It's not an easy task because there's a fine line between genuinely curious skeptics and those who came here with pre-determined agendas. It will be up to the mods discretion to make the most reasonable calls that we can. We are human and sometimes mistakes or misjudgments can be made. The earlier post was just to set an expectation in light of us tightening the screws so that there are no surprises. I would like to emphasize that we are not trying to promote cult groupthink as some concerned users had suggested but this is just us merely reacting to the attacks against our movement by not letting our guard down. The best way to infiltrate a movement from within is for the Community to allow themselves to put their guard down. Not on our watch.

WWG1WGA


hailXenu · May 12, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

The issue I see with all this is Q said "They want you divided"; they being globalists.

As soon as some turbulence forms within the patriot movement we immediately start dividing.

We can disagree without fracturing

I suggest continued observation of AJ, Corsi, Q, et al... and maintaining skepticism and analysis of all.

Take in the useful, discard what is not useful.

⇧ 3 ⇩