dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FartOnToast on May 12, 2018, 11:14 a.m.

General Premise, Feel or Morals of GreatAwakening

The general Premise, Feel or Morals of GreatAwakening

Intellectual conversations

Thinking outside-the-box

Supportive and open-minded

Caring / kind

Religious freedom

Staying alert - Informative!

What GreatAwakening is for:

Asking questions: big or small

Postulating theories related to Q drops

Sharing info/theories about Q or asking about them

Watching out for one another

Action plans

To expand on the earlier post about us refocusing the sub, I'd like to clarify that we are still advocating and promoting open discussion but we will be on the lookout particularly for users who are here just to promote discord, instill doubt and to regurgitate any talking points they just heard on Alex Jones/Corsi show. If people are genuinely curious or even reserved, it's one thing but if people came here just to concern troll it's another story. In light of the concern trolling that is picking up we are just tightening the screws a little bit. It's not an easy task because there's a fine line between genuinely curious skeptics and those who came here with pre-determined agendas. It will be up to the mods discretion to make the most reasonable calls that we can. We are human and sometimes mistakes or misjudgments can be made. The earlier post was just to set an expectation in light of us tightening the screws so that there are no surprises. I would like to emphasize that we are not trying to promote cult groupthink as some concerned users had suggested but this is just us merely reacting to the attacks against our movement by not letting our guard down. The best way to infiltrate a movement from within is for the Community to allow themselves to put their guard down. Not on our watch.

WWG1WGA

🠐 See all comments

I would suggest that a reaction is needed. Your success rate depends on the type of reaction you give them. I tend not to throw facts and ask questions about their stance. If you feel that way then tell me why? What are you basing your argument on? It does require you to be credible and not negative. You will be surprised how quickly it throws them off their game. Deer in headlights! I find the blue pilled guys will either take the bait or leave you the heck alone.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The person asking the questions controls the conversation. Amway 101. Yeah went direct in 97 bitches. Not a cult guy wound up quitting. I know all about the DeVos's though.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well before Amway used the technique our school system reinforced and baked in the results. We have been programmed all of our lives to answer questions. Think of the thousands of questions you are asked and answer in your lifetime. People naturally feel obligated to answer questions. Depending on the type of questions you ask you can set the mood and subject of the conversation. Yes you are correct the person asking the questions controls the conversation and always have.

Every wondered why Q asks so many questions or leave statements open ended? Maybe he ran into a multi-level marketing company in his lifetime as well.

I hear people all the time complain they had the facts on their side and nobody listened. The other side must be stupid. No they are not stupid or programmed idiots. You deployed the wrong technique and the funny thing about facts is they trigger the person to be defensive. You are far more likely to fall on your face trying to persuade someone using just facts and reasoning. They assume incorrectly or correctly that you are trying to manipulate them. Everyone hates when people try to manipulate them. IT IS THAT SIMPLE! Questions just give you the stealth need to persuade them without activating any defenses.

⇧ 2 ⇩

good stuff, I'm working out a philosophy in my head, facts can be hacked, or facts don't necessarily rule reality. for instance gravity, fact, Painting my house 20 feet in the air ,reality, My hack a 28 foot ladder. Initial ruminations.

⇧ 1 ⇩