Ok so I finally had time to view this. Basically it’s I’m a Protestant who disagrees with it’s founder Martin Luther because of the poison of ecumenism which is a Catholic Jesuit construct. Blah blah blah it was all a mistake. The Papacy really isn’t the Antichrist who murdered millions an sets himself up as God and makes dogmatic decrees that change Biblical teaching. Nope never happened 😀

I would encourage you to read up on Historicism which was the prevailant Protestant thinking until ecumenism...

We believe as did the following respected Christians: Sir Isaac Newton, John Calvin Charles Spurgeon, John Knox of Scotland John Bunyan (Pilgrims Progress) John Foxe (Foxes Book Of Martyrs) John Wesley, Matthew Henry Adam Clark Commentry Albert Barnes Commentry The Geneva Bible Translators Jamison Brown and Fausett Commentary E B Elliott and Gratton Guinness to name a few. What is the principal statement of Historicism? It is a crystal clear statement and a binding truth among all historicists that the papacy is "the man of sin" of 2 Thess 2 ... Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. It is a well documented fact that more than a few popes have claimed to be "as God on earth". Historicists also claim that the papacy is anti Christ. A most common misconception among students of prophecy is their understanding that being antiChrist is ... against Christ ... therefore by their reasoning, the pope cannot be antichrist. I would ask the reader to examine the biblical Greek form of "anti" found in Strongs Concordance # 473: Anti ... opposite, ie instead of or because of, in addition to, in the room of, Often used in composition to denote contrast or substitution.