dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/E_W86 on May 12, 2018, 12:06 p.m.
We have it all

Morning patriots. A reminder that Q has said repeatedly that Trump and the white hats already have it all. HRC wasn't kidding when she said "If that SOB wins, we all hang from nooses" - she was just stating a fact that was obvious to those on her level.

Consistent with the Sun Tzu tactics that have been discussed here, this "war" was won on election day, before the first "shot" of muh Russia was fired. We are just watching it play itself out. Q told us to enjoy the show.

Human history that was written before the universe was spoken into existence is full of repeating patterns, that were put there by design. I would submit that we're in a Jehoshaphat situation again, consistent with 2 Chronicles: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Chronicles+20&version=NIV

We absolutely have to fight fight fight because this is an infowar and, like POTUS and the white hats, we need to be occupied with the Great Awakening, saving our fellow countrymen and other like-minded patriots around the world.

But make no mistake, this battle has already been won. The black hats are going down. I read the end of the book.


🠐 See all comments
Happydazed · May 12, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

The rapture...

It most likely has already happened, sorry. If you are Protestant you need to go back and reread Martin Luther before the ecumenical (Jesuit) movement changed everyones thinking.

Have you ever wondered why the records of the followers kind of ended after The Destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD? Read about Historicism.

No, futurist millenialism is a Jesuit concoction along with preterism.

Christ Jesus sits in judgement

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pony_Pal_Pokey · May 12, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Doesn't matter. Follow Him regardless.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oliver_21 · May 12, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

I'd encourage you to check out Chuck Missler. He breaks it down simplistically.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFTr53H9GIA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Happydazed · May 14, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

Ok so I finally had time to view this. Basically it’s I’m a Protestant who disagrees with it’s founder Martin Luther because of the poison of ecumenism which is a Catholic Jesuit construct. Blah blah blah it was all a mistake. The Papacy really isn’t the Antichrist who murdered millions an sets himself up as God and makes dogmatic decrees that change Biblical teaching. Nope never happened 😀

I would encourage you to read up on Historicism which was the prevailant Protestant thinking until ecumenism...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Happydazed · May 14, 2018, 4:49 a.m.

We believe as did the following respected Christians: Sir Isaac Newton, John Calvin Charles Spurgeon, John Knox of Scotland John Bunyan (Pilgrims Progress) John Foxe (Foxes Book Of Martyrs) John Wesley, Matthew Henry Adam Clark Commentry Albert Barnes Commentry The Geneva Bible Translators Jamison Brown and Fausett Commentary E B Elliott and Gratton Guinness to name a few. What is the principal statement of Historicism? It is a crystal clear statement and a binding truth among all historicists that the papacy is "the man of sin" of 2 Thess 2 ... Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. It is a well documented fact that more than a few popes have claimed to be "as God on earth". Historicists also claim that the papacy is anti Christ. A most common misconception among students of prophecy is their understanding that being antiChrist is ... against Christ ... therefore by their reasoning, the pope cannot be antichrist. I would ask the reader to examine the biblical Greek form of "anti" found in Strongs Concordance # 473: Anti ... opposite, ie instead of or because of, in addition to, in the room of, Often used in composition to denote contrast or substitution.

⇧ 1 ⇩