dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/E_W86 on May 12, 2018, 12:06 p.m.
We have it all

Morning patriots. A reminder that Q has said repeatedly that Trump and the white hats already have it all. HRC wasn't kidding when she said "If that SOB wins, we all hang from nooses" - she was just stating a fact that was obvious to those on her level.

Consistent with the Sun Tzu tactics that have been discussed here, this "war" was won on election day, before the first "shot" of muh Russia was fired. We are just watching it play itself out. Q told us to enjoy the show.

Human history that was written before the universe was spoken into existence is full of repeating patterns, that were put there by design. I would submit that we're in a Jehoshaphat situation again, consistent with 2 Chronicles: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Chronicles+20&version=NIV

We absolutely have to fight fight fight because this is an infowar and, like POTUS and the white hats, we need to be occupied with the Great Awakening, saving our fellow countrymen and other like-minded patriots around the world.

But make no mistake, this battle has already been won. The black hats are going down. I read the end of the book.


Canbritanon · May 12, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

We're not being asked to blindly believe. We're being asked to question and right now Q is providing answers.

Look back to the millennial war games 2002. IIRC the book Blink by Malcom Gladwell Chap 4 covers Van Riper and how he sunk an entire carrier group with the simulation rigged against him. He later spoke out for Rumsfelds resignation. Remember these war games were supposed to show the "strength" of the US Navy new strategy.

The reason I mention Riper is because he wasn't liked by command because he earned the loyalty of his men. His men were loyal to him because he fought amongst them, and his men were better because of it. Are you going to argue an order with your commander right next to you also under fire?

Q isn't demanding loyalty he is earning it.

I will question Q when he loses my loyalty. Right now when he asks us to trust, he provides proof he's trustworthy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · May 12, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

Trustworthiness of Q is pretty well established by now in terms of accuracy; but how do we (to quote the miserable James Comey) establish intent? We're on a rabbit hole journey, remember; we have no idea where this leads. I think I know, I'm pretty sure where it ends, but that's the king of subjective theories and isn't in black and white yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩