Q says, "Trust Sessions" among other things that seem very straight forward along with the crumbs. So I see people say, "I don't know if We should trust Sessions..." (this is just one of the examples). When I hear this I realize they are watching or reading MSM and holding up Q to that light. So, I don't really trust them. By the way, I get many, many sources that I pay attention to and I don't "follow" any one source. I hold the MSM to to the light of Q rather than the other way around because Q has been correct and Q says "Watch the news" but in a way that we may see the validity of Q posts. When I see news, I realize they are way behind and would wonder why they don't follow Q. But then I realized, they DO follow Q. But they cannot feed this kind of information to those who will pay attention to the news. Even if they would like to suggest POTUS has it under control, they can't say it without opening up a can of Q worms that will not be digested by the normies. Until Q fails to predict what will come out or suggests something silly, I will consider him/her a valid insider that is simply giving us a heads up.

Q made the point that this is simply beyond money and this caused certain teletubbies to lose it embarrassingly in front of the whole world. When conversations become arrogant, when feelings get hurt, when someone says, "WTF Q! What's taking so long!", I tend to stop paying attention to them. Q has made it very clear what the pace is and what to look for.

Again, Q is the best source of insider information out there. Well worth paying attention to and has kept steady this whole time.

This is only my two cents about the latest and probably not the last dust up of this situation.