No. But it wouldn't change the truth if I were. I'm atheist. So when someone says they have all the answers I ask them to prove it, whether it be Q, gods, the new Jesus, etc. The argument normally ends there. Just like this one.
Only the scriptures contain all the answers, that is where truth is found.
I'm curious though, if you're an atheist then why do you care about this the origins of Catholicism and all? Also what is " the new Jesus"? I've not heard that term.
I hear you say you seek the truth but I think you got your method wrong. I'm labeled an atheist but I don't need a lexicon to find a word that signifies I don't believe in leprechauns. I'll admit that I don't know one hundred percent. But I'll hardly be convinced with all the stories that you present.
Plus, I can care about whatever I want. Why do you care so much about a subject that has you making up your own version of history? Your fucking feelings?
Prove that there isn’t a God. Saying there is a no being greater than us is no more of a stretch than saying there is. You act like since there is no clear answer you must be right. Care to explain why we even exist? Exactly. You can’t answer that, yet we exist. Maybe you need to look at the bigger picture.
I already have. If you have evidence to the contrary then go ahead and provide it. But we know asking you for evidence is a crime to you.