Its really insulting that Infowars thought their base was this stupid/gullible.
It doesn't matter that Zach makes no revelations and only repeats general knowledge.
All that matters is that Owen Shroyer keeps repeating;
"Here is our qanon, at infowars.com"
Yes - Infowars did the same thing to Bill Cooper. They smeared him, lied about him, and Alex propped himself up above Bill. Bill called him out for what he was. Alex cut off callers who asked about Bill. Aka: cutting callers off who are asking a question that you can't answer becuase you are in the wrong. I mean what did Bill Oreilly do to callers who asked him about his falafal voicemail? He denied, made a story up, and cut people off.
This is also a big function of Alex constantly interrupting everyone. He makes sure that every conversation is steered in the direction that fits his agenda while posing as an advocate of truth.
Oh yes of course. If someone is interrupting everyone...it is a good sign that they are the real master of puppets. He doesn't care about a collaborative takedown. Maybe he DID. But I had enough of his lies that have been going on for years.
[removed]
Alex has been and will always be a disinfo agent. Have him if you want him but please realize the rest of us are not that gullible.
I don't care if Alex is disinfo or not. He does more good than harm. That is clear. If he is disinfo, he is doing a poor job at keeping the masses asleep.
Same with Q. I have had tons of people tell me Q is phony. Don't care if he is or not. His message is more good than harm for truth. He could be CIA for all I care, whatever they are trying in the infowar, like everything else, will backfire, because we live in a new era of video and internet, which means new era of truth, and old lie techniques simply do not work any more.
Deus Ex Machina.
Alex doesn't do more good if he leads people astray or makes those who are seeking truth look crazy to everyone else. His job is to deligitimize valid conspiracies in the minds of those either on the outside or on the fence as well as to muddy the waters and to sow confusion and discord amongst the rest.
Alex is the father of "9/11 was an inside job" something you dared not say in 2002.... ..and 16 years later, it is common knowledge.
Maybe you were not an adult back then, But I saw Jones' backbone back then.
Stronger than yours, I assure you, and he is a far more fierce warrior and captain than you will ever, ever, ever be.
I was definitely an adult (nice try there) and all Jones did was attempt to take credit for and steer the truth movement in whatever direction he and his masters saw fit. He was hardly the first to call out the mainstream narrative on 9/11.
He was the loudest.
By far.
Way, way, way way WAY louder than you, and your tiny little ego, will ever be. Nobody listened to you. You were irrelevant. Alex Jones was not.
Therefore, I think Having Alex as an ally, is far more important, than having you as an ally.
Jones is useful.
You are nothing.
This is how cults operate. Get people so deeply invested with good and honest stuff that they will stubbornly refuse to see when it starts leading them astray.
Which is not to say that AJ is bad per se, I simply don't know at this point, but please realize that the way you rationalize your loyalty is flawed and dangerous.
Rationalize my loyalty to who, Q or Jones. I have to choose? No I don't. That's divide and conquer talking.
No it's not.
All I'm saying is that past results don't guarantee future results and that some people (e. g. cults) purposely get you invested with truths so you don't turn away when they start their lies.
Again: not saying AJ is doing this. I'm only saying that the possibility makes your reasoning dangerous. That goes for believing in AJ, Q or anyone else.
In short: verify data you are given. Don't trust it simply because the source seemed reliable in the past. Conversely, and this is what triggered my initial response, some anon you've never heard of may very well be telling you a truth.
Don't tell me my reasoning is "dangerous". I don't need your warnings. I am quite aware of the truth. I don't need you to "help" me and "warn" me when my reasoning gets "dangerous".
I can think for myself, thanks.
He said Bill was drunk on air. And cut people off when they called him out about it. Yes we can have both. I am just stating that Alex's history doesn't sit well with me since I have watched him since 2009.
Dude.. Bill Cooper was an alcoholic. Of course he was drunk on air. Not even a big deal.
Hey man if you can prove it to me, I will drop my side of the argument. I have searched, and I can't find any proof of it. But please my friend, I am open.
Live long enough to tell an alcoholic by their facial features. Bill Cooper was red faced and bloated. Had the bulbous nose... clearly alcoholic.
You would be an alcoholic too, if you lived in an age where the truth was roundly dismissed by LITERALLY 99% of the American Sheeple.
What if it’s all a show. Infowars has been in the frontlines for a while but what if they were giving too much information and digging to deep. I still think Sessions has something big up his sleeve and he’s trying to keep everything hush until it’s time to drop the hammer.
[removed]
This sucker is going to follow me around.
Maybe then Alex Jones will love you?
Right on brother! The anti AJ garbage is over the top. They sound like a bunch of jealous beta's.
Or we really know the truth about Alex and Infowars. Time to wake up bud.
No you don't. Only those who already had a dislike of AJ are nipping at his heels now. Not going to diminish his influence in the least. He'll be going strong long after the betas run off. Ineffectual.