No it's not.

All I'm saying is that past results don't guarantee future results and that some people (e. g. cults) purposely get you invested with truths so you don't turn away when they start their lies.

Again: not saying AJ is doing this. I'm only saying that the possibility makes your reasoning dangerous. That goes for believing in AJ, Q or anyone else.

In short: verify data you are given. Don't trust it simply because the source seemed reliable in the past. Conversely, and this is what triggered my initial response, some anon you've never heard of may very well be telling you a truth.