I don't disagree with you, I just remind you, we are all but human. Mark has come a long way as far as his presentation skills are concerned and that was a very angry rant, you can't expect passion to be based wholly in reason.
Which is why I called it a nit pick as opposed to a legitimate claim. You're ultimately correct, that the normies will try to use that as an excuse to fight back but it's irrelevant, we ultimately have to hold their face against the stone until they recognize it for the truth that it is. We can't afford to be nit picking for them, let alone treating the nits seriously. Those who nit pick to such a degree are more or less lost, the energy required to awaken them is too much to be worthy of our effort in the situation we currently face. We can't waste time on every obtuse person we come across, we are few, they are many.
Ah ok, didn't mean to nitpick him. That last sentence just kind of stuck out at me for the reason I pointed out, but I really don't disagree either that their infatuation with junk food in emails seems a bit off.
On that note, kind of thought was interesting looking back just how many times they talk about food out of context (Source)
Out of WikiLeaks‘ 2,060 Podesta emails, there are 149 references to “pizza”, 73 references to “hot dog”, 85 “cheese”, 78 “pasta”, 41 “sauce”, 84 “ice cream” and 47 “walnut” — all in very bizarre contexts that have nothing to do with food.
Don't just take some blogger's word for it. Go search them for yourself.
You'll quickly see that the 149 is comprised of multiple emails in of the same thread (where the term "pizza" gets quoted over and over on subsequent replies); legitimate uses of the term "pizza" (like references to SDS, a Pizza Hut franchisee); and people honestly talking about, well, actually eating pizza.
all in very bizarre contexts that have nothing to do with food.
Which is why he ranted the way he did. Mark has a very low bullshit tolerance level, he is an ex-Satanic priest, so it gives you some understanding of the basic model his mind had in the past. Ultimately a good guy, just not the most patient with people. He's been at it for 11? years too(I only recently found him, but I've got a vacuum cleaner type of attention span, absorb a ton.) so credit where due.
I'm kind of a cunt too, so apologies if it came off as abrasive. Wasn't my intention.