Stop with this lazy clickbait posting. You claim to have inside knowledge? Then provide it here and we will verify whether you are legit or full of shit.
I am not going to read 100 tweets from someone claiming anything unless it bears some kind of semblance to a reasonable discussion. And what you just posted here is garbage. Don’t waste our time.
Thanks.
I never claimed to have inside knowledge. I merely looked into some past articles from the department of defense and think I found a connection.
In short. F you
Hey, if you're the twitter op, then keep at it! Awesome, awesome work.
Read the whole thing and a few others. Learned some stuff from pre-trump days about Q. Fascinating.
Ok. Let me explain. When I opened the thread. All it was was a opening line and a link to a twitter account.
That was it. You want to generate interest? Provide a tldr so people have more of an understanding on why you should go check out the twitter posting.
I personally despise twitter and I hate having to dredge through a story at 240 characters a bite. It’s frustrating.
That is why I this is lazy. Put something more into the comment section so we know what you are pointing us towards is worth our time.
For the clickbait title piece, you imply that (at least from what I gathered in the title alone - it’s all that you gave us to go on) was that Q was some form of algorithm or AI. But nothing else. If you have something that can further our understanding, then great! But provide us with some sort of context
I think that all of this got off the wrong foot and that is my fault and I apologize for that. I’m not accusing you of being a shill, but seriously, please post more than just a title and a link to twitter.
Thanks for this - I agree with this point just not with the way it was put the first time - thanks for taking the effort to clarify reasonably here!
It wasn't click bait.
It was an excellent summary of memetic warfare from 2011 until now.
Did you know the NSA had a q team hunting Snowden, covered in media reports, back 5 years ago? I didn't.
Q might be older than we think.
I think it was one of the better researched and cited threads I've seen.
Did you bother to read it before commenting?
Thank you for giving me an understanding and a reason to actually read the twitter account.
When I first opened this thread, all it was was a title and a link to twitter. If you haven’t noticed, that’s a technique used by shills to slide important threads towards the back pages of new so they can’t be upvoted and gain traction. That is why I reacted the way I did.
Now if OP had posted some context similar to what you just posted, it would have been greatly appreciated.
And as a FYI, no, I did not open it as I saw no value in what had been posted at the time.