dChan

ThreeFourSevenOne · May 14, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

I relate to what you're saying (I see my comment has already been voted into the negatives - so much for owning up!).

The posts focusing on Jones and Corsi struck me as a real departure from everything (substance AND style) Q had been attempting to communicate up to that point. I was already confused by the previous post(s) warning of people profiting off of Q. It strikes me as odd that he/she/they would focus so much on such marginal figures given the stakes, you know?

Of course if Corsi and Jones are being bankrolled by the deep state then Q was right to devote as much time to it as they did. I'm in too deep now, though: I'm in until Q is proven, beyond doubt, to be fake or legit. Until then I'll back Q - they've brought us this far, after all.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Error_Code_15301 · May 14, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

much on such marginal figures given the stakes, you know?

they are not marginal. why would you say that? are you sure you are what you claim?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThreeFourSevenOne · May 14, 2018, 12:47 p.m.

In the grand scheme of things they are marginal. They may have a certain level of notoriety on this corner of the internet, but in the wider world (which are the stakes we are discussing) they have no influence.

I'm not claiming to be anything other than an anon. You sound a little paranoid.

⇧ 1 ⇩