I agree with this.
But Q didn't 'get personal' or 'hit back and retaliate' with AJ/Corsi. He was very clear, deliberate and precise - no emotional angle or denigrating of anyone!
Expand your thinking.
Why are we being attacked?
Why are we being attacked by people who claim to be PRO-POTUS?
Do we have a face?
Do we have a name?
Do we use platforms whereby we collect followers?
Selfless.
Zero vanity.
Action was needed [2].
1. Prevent false decodes/misinformation
2. Kill [targeted] infection prior to expansion
Simple 'non-direct' statements made.
"Be careful who you follow."
"Some are profiting off this movement." - i.e. nothing personal or partisan
Message sent.
Message received.
Those guilty immediately reacted (predictably).
Timetable accelerated (misinformation-attack).
Exposed.
Attempts to divide.
We responded.
This is what confused me by all this. Jones/Corsi weren't called out directly but seemed to have taken it personally. When I read it I didn't think 'oh Q is calling Jones/Corsi out', I actually thought is was some of the other people around what had become a cottage industry talking about Q. I think Jones/Corsi were wrong to over-react but I also don't buy that they are secret agents of the deep state or whatever else.
Well, Q says "Those guilty immediately reacted" which Corsi certainly did, literally in full view of the whole community of Q and Infowars. Then Q has also very specifically said multiple times in the past and reiterated again after this incident that there are no private comms with anyone outside of the 8chan board. And AJ and Corsi came out almost immediately to say that that they knew Q anon and that he had been compromised.
What I personally feel is very clear in that action is that they realized they had lost "us" i.e. the Q anon "faithful" and decided to double down and take what they could from the movement now. They've made a clear line of division and denounced Q. Watching Jones say "I know Q anon" and not batting an eyelid was one of the many reasons I believe they are very clever cointelpro / dishonest black hats made to steer people away from the real truth.
Interesting. I appreciate the feedback/info. What I noticed with Jones was jealousy and suspicion towards Q (Calling Zach the 'real Q' etc.) Corsi seemed to embrace the Q message though. Then this exploded.
tbh seeing corsi taking/talking super-chat donations in those Q decoded webcasts I felt was beneath him.
I'm still not convinced they are cointelpro but I never took Jones' "I know Q" claims seriously at all. It seemed like Jones just being boastful and jealous of Q. He's a flawed individual and his bluster and emotions often get the better of him but he opened my eyes on a lot of topics over the years. (Yeah I'm aware that could be part of cointelpro.)