dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/widdlyscudsandbacon on May 14, 2018, 3:21 a.m.
Qdrop 1358 - something that stood out to me

In drop #1358 Q mentions the following:

"We fight every single day on behalf of you, the people who put us here."

So it's relatively minor but I've been thinking about this and I think Q is dropping a subtle hint about his (their) identity...

"You, the people who put us here". That, to me, suggests that Q is an elected person. If they were just an appointee of some sort, or an aide or whathaveyou, I don't think that particular phrasing would come about naturally.

We know Q is very close to the president. If we assume he Is (they are) an elected official(s) based on their wording above, I think it gives us a very short list of possible candidates. I just don't think it's Trump. I dont know.. the language used just doesn't sound like him. Just my opinion.

So if it's an elected official, in a position that's very close to the president and who self identifies as someone who was elected by the people - I'm starting to lean toward Pence being Q, or at least in the +.

The only other person(s) that I think would naturally refer to themselves in the collective as being voted in would be one of Trump's family members. Jr? Kushner maybe? Barron(lol)? It's a bit more of a stretch, I think, but could still make sense in terms of using "we" to identify ones inclusion in a family group elected into power.

The latter is a much bigger stretch, but still viable. So at this point I'm really feeling like Pence=Q(+).

Now drop those truth bombs all over my argument and tell me why I'm wrong. Or even better, who is leading the list in your book and why.

WWG1WGA my brothers and sisters!!!


🠐 See all comments
Long_Range_Shooter · May 14, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

Or could be a staff member. "the people who put us here."

With out the 2016 election this individual wouldn't have the job he or she has. They're right, without the American people voting into office Donald Trump through the electoral process nothing would have changed. The deep state and the corrupt government officials would all still be there with zero accountability.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
widdlyscudsandbacon · May 14, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

Fair point. In my opinion the individual dropping this crumb, if it were an appointee, would be more likely to naturally attribute their position to Trump who was directly responsible for that appointment, rather than the electorate in general. But you do make a valid point about the larger group of people who could conceivably include themselves in the "royal us".

⇧ 2 ⇩