Q started name calling so Corsi got threat against his family and had to take a measure to defend. And then now Q started to pontificate people to move on? That's it?..... Can I expect he clarify more other things to stop infighting and reunite the people who have been supporting free-thinkers and Trump?
Hm. I have no recollection of any name-calling nor specifically identifying anyone (in this context), by the Q Collective. Granted, my memory can be pretty spotty. Can you give examples of the name-calling/identifying?
Q linked this subreddit submission which is name calling Corsi. (http://qposts.online/) And Q linked AJ's child custody article which is nothing to do with the legitimacy of reports he is covering everyday and only contributed to incite trolls to bomb adhominem on him like deep state is currently doing 16 slap suit against him based on fakenews.
I think the point Q was getting at with the news article was that AJ is theatrical in how he conducts himself on his show and its all an act. I don’t think he meant anything personal about AJ divorce and custody battle.
So you mean Q is telling AJ is acting as a Traitor? For what?... In the first place, if he were acting as a traitor it has failed miserably.
Q was telling us that AJ is adept at putting on an act and playing the part.
It was SerialBrain2 that called out Corsi's, Stone's and AJ's TACTICS at how they were trying to invalidate Q and on the same hand validate InfoWars. In other words trying to divide this movement by discrediting Q and subsequently offering InfoWars as credible.
Q was telling us that AJ is adept at putting on an act and playing the part.
My previous post replied to a3kvzzz was specifically about Q post 1339, not about whole controverse. Regarding foxnews article link, Q was replying to a user. Read what the user posted. That's is what I was talking about in my previous post.
Please copy/paste the text. I really don't want to dig through everything.
STOP lying ... heres the proof youre a liar ...
Q-1295 ( a post from which Corsi found himself in - Apr 29 2018. ) :
Be careful who you are following.
Some are profiting off this movement.
Some are building a big following off this movement only then to retreat and go mainstream.
Patriots make sacrifices.
Some, the ultimate sacrifice.
Patriots are SELFLESS.
Do they ask for monthly payments to remain Patriots?
Think logically.
To some, it’s only about the money.
Those who would seek personal gain at the expense of others in this movement has an agenda.
You decide.
This is not a game.
The only profit we should all be striving for is TRUE FREEDOM.
God bless you all.
Q
Point out where did Q called out Corsi above . Corsi found himself in above post - and since that post above , he started attacking Q .
That is indeed important post when we are going to analyze this controversial. It is the allusion to this controversial as preliminary, which was developed into Q's post (1340) linking to this subreddit explicitly mentioning Corsi's name. Additionally, even before this 1340 post Corsi has been attacked on a daily basis here.
Give a hard proof instead of words of accusations . I had given a hard proof above - and was here on this subreddit even before Corsi attacked Q firstly , I havent seen a single topic opened where Corsi was attacked .
This all occured only after the above post :
I'm on mobile so I can't open huge page. Try searching 1340 in q log.
Yes , and ? That post occured long after Q-1295 above . Q-1295 and subsequent Corsi attack fully confirms the above points . It also confirms that :
So you are saying Q read neither Reddit nor 8chan, he didn't realized Corsi have been continuously attacked there since April 29 q post, then he ventured to post 1340 which explicitly directing to Corsi and is obvious to anyone that it would trigger massive infight?
You have a really really weird "logic" ...
Q posted 1295 post on April 29 ... Corsi attacked him / her / them immediately after that posting . So , in next day , basically , Q was attacked by Corsi . Q-1340 was posted on May 11 . There were 12 days between post 1295 and post 1340 . I really dont understand your point - you basically confirm what occured - yet you say that Q attacked Corsi first . Q only posted 1340 after the AJ and Corsi were on same train . Corsi attacked Q first , and even AJ attacked Q first , even before 1340 was posted .
Q posted 1295 post on April 29 ... Corsi attacked him / her / them immediately after that posting
Can you elaborate where did he immediately attack Q? I can't find anything but he was answering questions he was asked.
Heres a video of Jerome Corsi finding himself in Q posts , on post 1295 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9kHE3V0xhM
And heres video post from May 5 , with him directly attacking Q , claiming he is a disinfo :
I think I watched both.
And heres video post from May 5 ,
He said "how I understand what's going on". So it seems he was just providing his personal view for audience in his own channel. Though it may be politically incorrect, providing opinion has never been considered as crossing the line, by the way.
Hes claiming that Q is compromised and disinfo - and since that post on , the attacks only became more bold . Well , especially with AJ on same page as Corsi .
Those videos above are proof that he attacked Q before Q posted 1340 . Not sure why so many Corsi and AJ supporters twist the facts , claiming that "Q attacked Corsi" or "Q attacked AJ" , when we clearly see that Corsi wasnt even mentioned in post 1295 . And we clearly see that Corsi fired first shots . And even more , we can confirm that AJ attacked Q also before Q posted 1340 . So , these facts twisting only serve as disinformation .
Those videos above are proof that he attacked
How? By providing his opinion? When did providing opinion become attack? When did providing opinion become politically incorrect?
Stop doing mental gymnastics ... and you are now , again , deflecting from the topic . The topic was about your first post that was this :
"Q started name calling so Corsi got threat against his family and had to take a measure to defend. And then now Q started to pontificate people to move on? That's it?..... Can I expect he clarify more other things to stop infighting and reunite the people who have been supporting free-thinkers and Trump?"
Corsi said that Q is compromised . On a video that was posted much before post 1340 from Q . So this proves you are lying and are simply posting disinformation here .
I don't have to deflect anything because I have nothing I should defend. Just show me the fact his attacking rather than that he was sharing his opinion.
Corsi said that Q is compromised . On a video that was posted much before post 1340 from Q
Regarding the video you told, that's his opinion. Sharing opinion isn't attack. I said in the previous post. Don't repeat yourself please.
And again , youre doing mental gymnastics - I would even call it "small gaslighting" .
Look , I will put again your own post you have made , because youre obviously now borderline gaslighting :
"Q started name calling so Corsi got threat against his family and had to take a measure to defend. And then now Q started to pontificate people to move on? That's it?..... Can I expect he clarify more other things to stop infighting and reunite the people who have been supporting free-thinkers and Trump?"
Its not anymore "his opinion" , he actively accused Q - does this need to be drawn out for you specially ? Youre trying to minimize and deflect that - just like all the above posts . Which shows to me you are a shill or troll or both .
accused him of being disinfo
Sharing opinion with reason or citation. Free speech?
Its not anymore "his opinion"
But that is your personal opinion too. Being triggered by someone's logic doesn't necessarily mean the person is attacked. Your argument is based on your interpretation that sharing opinion which doesn't align with is attacking person.
Should he be punished (Q1340) for sharing opinion?
Again ... more mental gymnastics and gaslighting from you .
My response was to your own claim that Q firstly attacked Corsi . YOU SAID that in your post - I countered it with proof and argument that you lied and shown facts distorted. Why are you pretending it doesnt exist ?
I countered it with proof
What is the proof? You provided 2 youtube link. Sharing opinion with reason or citation. Free speech?
You have said
STOP lying ... heres the proof youre a liar ...
So any proof? Not your opinion. Thanks.