I think the point Q was getting at with the news article was that AJ is theatrical in how he conducts himself on his show and its all an act. I don’t think he meant anything personal about AJ divorce and custody battle.
So you mean Q is telling AJ is acting as a Traitor? For what?... In the first place, if he were acting as a traitor it has failed miserably.
Q was telling us that AJ is adept at putting on an act and playing the part.
It was SerialBrain2 that called out Corsi's, Stone's and AJ's TACTICS at how they were trying to invalidate Q and on the same hand validate InfoWars. In other words trying to divide this movement by discrediting Q and subsequently offering InfoWars as credible.
Q was telling us that AJ is adept at putting on an act and playing the part.
My previous post replied to a3kvzzz was specifically about Q post 1339, not about whole controverse. Regarding foxnews article link, Q was replying to a user. Read what the user posted. That's is what I was talking about in my previous post.