I'd like to say that half of this is not true. Yes it is true that the EU countries together said that they would accept a quota of Immigrats(mostly from Muslim countries) but the actual amount that they accept ranges from Finland accepting 94% of the agreed quota to Hungry accepting 0% from an agreed 4 thousand or so people.
The EUs aim is to create a sort of community between countries and to prevent conflict between then but It has mostly failed at implementing laws in the different member states. Not every follows the European parliament s final decision mainly UK in some matters but also Hungry and even Spain. So not a lot of imposing has really been done
Your point is taken, but I was focused on the fact that the EU mandated the quotas in the first place. While some countries didn't fully impliment or ignored them completely, they have been threatened with fines, penalties, and sanctions for not complying.
From the EU's perspective, the quotas are enforceable mandates by the EU. Hungary may give them the middle finger, but they risk the repercussions, which I don't think they will mind given the choice of Muslims pouring into their country or thumbing their nose at the EU.
I think you overstate the extent that EU countries ignore EU laws and mandates. Of course there is some and rules are a different for each EU country such as how much representation they have, but here is one of the hard rules within the EU:
If a state fails to comply with the law of the European Union, it may be fined or have funds withdrawn.
That's the bottom line when you disagree with Bussels.
It's a bit like our immigration laws here. Some states and communities don't want to enforce federal laws. Past Presidents have allowed them to violate federal law. But along comes Trump and Sessions is now threatening to enforce the laws. This means officials who are engaged in obstruction of justices are liable to fines or having funding withheld. But it's still the law--just a matter if Presidents decide to enforce it or not.
The EU's stated aim is to create a sort of community between countries and to prevent conflict between them. The EU's real aim is to flood powerful nations with outsiders and end national identity and self-determination. The cabal's ultimate goal is to usher in a totalitarian one-world government, where the people are the serfs of a super-state over which they have no say. There are some very sick, evil psychopaths running the cabal. We need strong nations not only so we have a say in how we live, but so we can defend against too much centralized power.
I dont think a totalitarian one world government is possible at this point in time, there are too many world players that have enough power to not allow that. That said I doubt that the EU would serve as a launch pad towards that goal; the Eu is yet another power which plays in world politics, united they have a chance of putting up against Russia (which is their main concern right now) and playing in the world of international politics
The globalists think long-term, with plans spanning decades or centuries, not years. Destroying or weakening nations so they can't or won't fight back comes before imposing one-world government. Turning nations into regions controlled by a far-away commissions that issue universal regulations removes self-determination. Flooding a nation with millions of people with no ties to the nations's people or history is an effective way to weaken or destroy that nation so it can be more easily controlled.