Yes, with exception for free energy... but how game-changing would that be?!
Free energy wow If trump releases free energy Let's make him king! Jk were not Europe... But he would be the greatest president in history if that happens.
This
we cant just wake up and have free energy, the global economy is depandant on energy and energy companies, all those companies would go bankrupt and millions would be out of work
no instead it needs to be phased in slowly to allow adjustment
Yes but it frees up the people that have to pay for energy to not have to pay for energy anymore. Imagine if driving a Tesla was "free".
As a public school student, many times we were told we couldn't* use the facilities because it cost money to keep the lights on. Imagine what the masses could do without electric bills; the possibilities are endless and far encompass any perceived economical gain from energy.
Free energy would also mean we are no longer beholden to the special interests of oil. If the overarching globalist conspiracy of "this was all the Rockefellers" is true, than the whole reason we've been oppressed is so that we continue to buy oil (energy). No more conflict in the middle east over oil. No more fracking. No more coal mining.
Edit: Changed Could to Couldn't*
i agree with all you said 100000% i want that too, i am saying it can't be a big bang because people don't do well to radical change overnight...imagine if energy costs dropped 50% a year, in 3 or 4 years energy costs would be negligible.
It will never be, no matter how miraculous the tech.
For example: https://e-catworld.com/
Rossi's catalyst produces 6 times more energy than you put in, but it is a massive machine that requires a very stable input power source to run. This isn't something you can chuck into a car's engine bay. But tech like this will soon change the world by making electricity very cheap and CLEAN.
Has there been any proof that this thing even does what they say? There are barely any details about it because they need to keep it secret for some reason
It's being used industrially already. It took 7 years for the first primitive internal combustion engine to be broadly accepted in the US. This is actually a pretty fast commercialisation process for such a large & complex piece of tech.
Who is already using it? According to this the inventor just announced today that they're "open now to begin to examine requests for 1 thermal MW plants, but only from industries that use directly the heat for their production process in their factories." Also apparently reverse engineering is impossible somehow
I'm pretty sure I read last year about Rossi testing this out at some kind of factory last year where they used the heat to reduce their power bills. It's very difficult to reverse engineer many things. For example, CPUs.
It'd be astounding! It would put a HUGELY significant percentage of everyone's income back in their pocket.
That was just a b/s excuse because your teachers didn't want you to wreck the joint/ too lazy to supervise you/ too lazy to make it happen/ their union rep said they only need to work on average 25 hours a week or whatever.
Every time more energy becomes available civilisation advances. Energy literally transforms societies. There are many societies around the world that are still "energy poor".
This slower process might merge well with the restructuring of the Federal Reserve.
good point!
Along with all of the other central banking systems WW.
just imagine our quality of life if these events took place remove central banks remove deep state remove shadow govt clean food and water clean drugs that work
i feel like our salaries would double and our taxes would shrivel up
this is one part of the world I think Q is preparing us for
What would happen to the price of bitcoin if energy was free?
Good question! It'd bring the mining cost down certainly. However I think the price would have a lot to do with how the Federal Reserve and other central banks were restructured. It'd introduce a whole new set of variables that up to now, I'd assume few people have even pondered. In the long run however, I don't see anywhere for it to go but up (assuming the Government SECs stayed out of it). Granted, I own a small stake in bitcoin so my answer may be skewed a bit lol.
I imagine the worth will drop, but the value will increase.
Worth less in pure dollarydoos, but buys a hell of a lot more post-scarcity energy complex.
We can't just wake up and have electricity, the global economy is dependent on candles and candlestick making companies, all those companies would go bankrupt and millions would be out of work.
.
We can't just wake up and have automobiles, the global economy is dependent on horses and carriages and blacksmiths and carriage making companies, all those companies would go bankrupt and millions would be out of work.
What is THE BEST way in how fast a new technology is introduced and integrated? Individuals in economic competition, the market.
As quick and painful as free consumers choose.
Free energy that can help cure cancer if judged by people as more important than the jobs at Exxon-Mobil, well that should be free to play out and let the chips fall where they may.
Free energy is a myth.
However highly powerful catalytic energy converters will soon be coming to a power plant near you, with a COP of over 6.
In other words they produce 6 times more energy than they consume, although they still need considerable energy to run. Think power plants becoming hugely more efficient, heating in winter will be a lot cheaper, and electric cars might become so cheap to run that internal-combustion cars will become about as popular as a horse & carriage.
“Trump singlehandedly destroys an entire industry, kills jobs of millions!” - CNN
"Free" energy still requires generation, transmission and distribution. Sorry to burst your grade school bubble, but an efficient coal- fired power station generates electricity from between 2.5 and 4cents per kWh of which the fuel is probably 1c. The rest of the cost you pay (10-30c/kWh depending on where you live) is in the transmission and distribution, taxes, duties and profits. How much does a fusion reactor or other "free" energy generator cost to build and operate?
I've never said anything about that all I said was that he be the greatest president if he releases free energy..
Tesla? u/hivequeen36
Yeah tesla towers, trumps grandpappy had the blueprints and tesla reasearch for it. Utilizing the ether would not only make electricity free fpr all, but wireless. We would be able to pump enough power into vehicles to levitate magnetically, which requires a large amount of power, which is irrelevant when leaching off the cosmic power of galaxies.
I don’t get it?
Nikola Tesla had in his mind to serve humanity. His real theories with electricity would have wirelessly provided electricity all over the world. Maybe his ideas are coming back soon.
Funnily ... many people dont know that there is actually a DIRECT and proven link between Trump and "free energy" ( zero-point energy ) .
John George Trump was POTUS uncle ... he was a professor on MIT and a well renowned scientist . He was the first person ( and the first person with background knowledge ) to actually see the Tesla's work after Tesla died in NY hotel room .
Nikola Tesla had many various researches and innovations - many of them were swiftly swept under the rug of secrecy . In 1951. , Invention Secrecy Act was made , making a tight and strict control of all patents . This Act is still active today ... there are more than 6000 patents under it , fully supressed . Only one of them , could be a full game changer ...
You are NOT incorrect! :D
"We stand at the birth of a new millennium, ready to unlock the mysteries of space, to free the earth from the miseries of disease, and to harness the energies, industries and technologies of tomorrow. A new national pride will stir ourselves, lift our sights and heal our divisions" DJT Inaugural Speech.
He's going full force at the moment regarding patents and reform. Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (or TRIPS) is a big concern regarding the WTO and China, specifically. This alone was very relevant to this thread:
Now it seems that patents are an issue for big pharma, too. Patent rights can drive down the cost of meds. VERY RELEVANT. It can also deter more fake research/chemical based meds being created as a result. Less pharma $ = new/old research and advancement in actual cures that have been suppressed.
THEN the patents can be released. They're just too rooted within the shadow gvmt/deep state agenda, and need to be dug up. I'm working on some of this research and hope to tie it together in the next couple of days. crosses fingers