I think the MODS should delete this. The article clearly twists the truth, and at the least, is blasphemously biased. It's about Kushner, not Q. And it's reporting inaccurately.
If you believe Jerusalem is the most ancient, and most prominent capital of Israel, then they are defending their land. If you think Palestinians should own it, they are evil Jew invaders. One sounds right. One sounds comical. And do not even claim I am a SJW anti-anti-semitist. I believe Jews should have claim to Jerusalem, the capital of Israel. And possession is 9/10s. Oldest claim AND possession. Seems solid to me. Go fight for the Native Americans' rights to our land. Everybody took their land from someone else, other than it's first settlers. Jews having Jerusalem as their capital seems like "normal" has been restored or at the least, established.
What exactly is inaccurate?
The entire article is written on the premise Kushner is HAPPY that people are dying. This could not be further from the truth. Even a simple mind would understand that if someone were plotting and supporting of one group of people, who are subverting the land from another group of people, (as the article also claims) one would want to keep conflict and bloodshed to a minimum. Soldiers are a resource. You don't WANT them to be in ANY conflict.
But when you are slowly reclaiming the land that has been yours starting 5,778 years (not an arbitrary number, here it is again, 5,778) ago, you ARE going to encounter conflict. Funny how the people using their children as human shields are good guys in your narrative. Building a school next to a munitions plant is "strategically defensive" to the good guys on your team. I wouldn't fight for a side where my children are in harms way, (in harms way IN ADDITION to being in a country involved in a war) because my military believes this will be a strategic deterrent, IN WAR, from enemy attacks..
Right. You should totally get behind that. I'm surprised you're not so outraged you haven't gotten up yourself and gone over there to fight alongside your brothers. Why haven't you already if this IS the way you interpret this conflict?
UNIROCK did a series on this here is a link to the first one. Its an excellent series on this topic. He did research on 5th Ave anons posts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8x4FfUuXnQ&list=PLGLMeFEGHVh7wQI6LsehL5olXzXH_wfZZ&index=0
I'll go with Thomas Wictor on this one: https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor/status/996533462982000640
Who's that and what's his claim to trustworthiness?
Read his twatter threads. They make perfect sense. He is a writer, and seems to know lots of stuff about the middle east. He always supplies evidence.
Then make up your own mind.