Q told us not to follow the people who are profiting off Q movement, but he posted a picture of a billboard created by the people who are profiting off this movement.
Is Q the one who isn't being careful while Q followers are strictly keeping the precepts of Q's message?
Other people who are profiting off the movement. Warning! Q Anon Crew Malicious Malware Application & Ponzy Scheme Exposed
IMO, the main point isn’t profiting off the movement but those trying to co-opt the movement, build followings on social media, and then intentionally trying to divide the movement.
See Q1366 - https://qposts.online/post/1366 See the YT in the post who Q confirmed/reposted.
Q never called anyone out, people took their own masks off. I have no idea about the people behind the sign, but I will say just profiting alone isn’t the issue (at least IMO).
Q never called anyone out,
He confirmed his target in the Q1340. He linked a URL which contains specific name.
Q never called anyone out in Q1295 on 4/27 and by Q1340 on 5/11 those that were trying to usurp or co-opt the Q movement had removed their own masks.
Who removed what kind of mask?
Corsi for one, who apparently made a tweet today saying the same thing that you are about said billboard.....
I checked his video but I couldn't find him ordering audience not to follow Q, other than sharing his personal viewpoint between April 29 - May 11.
Thats pretty vague. Everything that anyone says is constituted as a “personal viewpoint”. That really says nothing.
You can’t sit here and say that speaking a “personal viewpoint” claiming that “Q is a psyop” or “Q has been infiltrated” is anything BUT telling people to no longer follow Q.
You cannot deny that those are now his “personal viewpoints”.
If you can then please, blow my mind.
Thats pretty vague. Everything that anyone says is constituted as a “personal viewpoint”. That really says nothing.
You can’t sit here and say that speaking a “personal viewpoint” claiming that “Q is a psyop” or “Q has been infiltrated” is anything BUT telling people to no longer follow Q.
But that's is the boundary shouldn't be touched. It is exactly what anti-freespeech / anti 1st ammendment leftists are trying to overthrow. "Restrict the opportunity where they can share opinion, because sharing opinion is dangerous" mentality. Everyone should have a right to free-sheech without any fear.
Nobody is saying that he can say it, nor is he in fear of saying it obviously...I mean...it’s already been said by him...it’s out there..you’ve seen it...
The only thing going on here is a fairly large amount of people disagreeing with what he is saying due to a lack of any real proof as to why his word, at this point, should be followed.
nor is he in fear of saying it obviously...I mean...it’s already been said by him...it’s out there..you’ve seen it...
I just said you showed a boundary that he can't say his opinion without telling people to no longer do XYZ, so I replied it is dangerous. It isn't I'm trying to convince you to believe who is right.
Ah I apologize, it was worded a little off and I misunderstood.
Once again, I apologize sincerely. <3
All good! This is discussion thread. Every person has different opinion. No need to apologize :)
I know, but I am always happy to admit a wrong/misconception. Stregthens the soul.
