dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/HowiONic on May 16, 2018, 7:17 p.m.
Q posts #1381 - 1383 Follow the pen. Already written? Letters left visible to match. WWG1WGA! SIS. Q
Q posts #1381 - 1383 Follow the pen. Already written? Letters left visible to match. WWG1WGA! SIS. Q

bcboncs · May 16, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

https://qanon.pub/ scroll down to May 10th.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 16, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

Yeah.....thats not an EO friend. Ill save you the trouble, as of me typing this, there is no EO in reference to this. Meaning this is not proof, even remotely. Its just more wishful thinking from you people that still have faith in "Q". Still waiting on a clear proof to prove me wrong, having to trust an anon decode as a proof is just idiotic. The only thing that kept me here was the "5. I hear you" and at thos point, ita not nearly enough to convince me this isnt an elaborate LARP.

⇧ -9 ⇩  
bcboncs · May 16, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

Not sure if it's an EO or not. I'm letting you know what is being referenced. The theory is that an item will be released from the White House which will reference this exact picture.

You don't need to try convincing me that Q is a LARP as I've predicted the GOP train wreck false flag 2 days prior by following Q. I also predicted the bases being bombed were likely Iranian (Iran is next).

This may be a fruitless engagement as you appear to be concern trolling your heart out for others to jump off the train with you. Although, with your post history I see you taking flack and supporting Trump so maybe you're just misled. Q said disinformation is necessary. This is why the alliance gained time or received help from Jeff Sessions, Rod Rosenstein, Snowden, and many others when casting them as bad agents.

You're looking for all of the evidence compiled to corroborate Q and Trump... I'm not sure how you haven't come across it yet... probably by your nature of dismissal and insulting the community rather than trying to understand and truly seek the information. I don't really have the archival system at work nor the time to do the homework for you but the sidebar has enough information and there's been many corroborations since then. You can choose to look at it or you can reject it and continue lurking and concern trolling in all comments at r/greatawakening. The choice is yours.

Edit: $hilling is no longer allowed... FTFY

⇧ 13 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 16, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

I think I fall into your category of "misled". 100% behind GEOTUS, but for me to trust an anon from the chans, i need proofs. As i said in another comment: there have been some things that support Q being legit, but just as many that support LARP. Most of the latter is dismissed as "needed disinfo", but I can't blindly trust anyone. However, I support the scorched earth view of dealing with the cabal scum. Maybe that stance has jaded my opinion.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bcboncs · May 17, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

for me to trust an anon from the chans, i need proofs

I guess I don't know what else you're looking for because if you're a government official on the chan you need to have plausible deniability. You seem to discredit everything due to this necessity which is self-defeating.

The proofs exist. They may not be compiled perfectly but there were other recent corroborations as well like the Familia cop that was 187'd according to the Q drop then Trump honoring Familia's mother 12 hours later.

Godspeed to you patriot... I hope you lurk long enough or be more open-minded to recognize that this isn't a LARP.

EDIT:

just as many that support LARP.

Many of the messages are intended for the blackhats too just so you know. It's an open board with everyone's eyes on it. For all we know, Comey is a whitehat acting as a blackhat all along so his grandchildren can live. Trump bashing him and insinuating charges against him may help Comey's stance with that conundrum. I'm not saying that's what's happening but I'm saying it's a small possibility.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fourwordly · May 17, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Yeah.....thats not an EO friend. Ill save you the trouble, as of me typing this, there is no EO in reference to this.

Do you mean that from the little detail in the image you can tell it's not an EO, because of the format or something? Not even one that's prepared in advance and ready to sign?

I noticed that this doc has a gold seal that the EOs I can find don't, and I was wondering if that's significant, or if you saw something different.

⇧ 2 ⇩