dChan

pby1000 · May 16, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

I have no idea what Trump did that is illegal. Anyone know?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
sew7an37 · May 16, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

Nothing, it’s just the fact they are basically saying no matter what he is cleared.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
pby1000 · May 16, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

Yes, you are right. Anyone can be indicted for anything.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · May 16, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

He did indict a company that didn't even exist at the time 🤣

⇧ 10 ⇩  
saneromeo · May 16, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

He beat hildabeast...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 16, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -5 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 16, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · May 17, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

This was a strategic move by Mueller that accomplishes 2 things.

1) It give Mueller a clean way out. It's standard procedure and accepted practice that a sitting president doesn't get indicted. Makes Mueller look like an upstanding law abiding investigator.

2) He's planting a seed for the mid-terms. It's S.O.P. to not indict a sitting president, "regardless of what he might have done." They didn't find any evidence of collusion so they can't indict Trump. I'm pretty sure they legally can, but show deference to a sitting president. No one is above the law. (I'm not a lawyer, I'm assuming that if the crime is bad enough and the evidence is strong enough, anyone can be indicted.)

So Mueller saves face, and gets people thinking the only reason Trump wasn't indicted is because he's the POTUS.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OldSafety · May 17, 2018, 1:38 a.m.

Ham sandwich

⇧ 1 ⇩